[VII.Q. Consider and act upon a Resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute conveyance documents for the acquisition of the necessary property interests, right-of-way and easements for E. Elm Street, S. Texas Drive and E. Oak Street. (Janney)]

I WILL MOVE TO ITEM Q. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE NECESSARY PROPERTY INTEREST, RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS FOR EAST ELM STREET, SOUTH TEXAS DRIVE AND EAST OAK STREET. GOOD EVENING. WE ARE LOOKING TO ACQUIRE THESE PROPERTY INTERESTS AT THIS LOCATION SHOWN HERE ON ELM STREET, TEXAS AND OAK IN DOWNTOWN. ON MARCH 10TH, 2026, COUNCIL APPROVED THE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN, WHICH INCLUDED THE DOWNTOWN STREETS AS WELL AS ELM STREET, TEXAS, AND OAK. JULY OF 26, COUNCIL AUTHORIZED A WORK ORDER WITH GARVER TO PROVIDE DESIGN SERVICES FOR THESE ROADWAY SEGMENTS. AS DESIGN HAS PROGRESSED, STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THE NEED TO ACQUIRE THESE PROPERTY INTERESTS. OAK DRIVE WILL TERMINATE AT A CUL DE SAC EAST OF DOE BRANCH, AND STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT ACQUIRING THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL SUPPORT THE PARKS DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS, INCLUDING IMPROVED ACCESS AND STAGING. ADDITIONALLY, THE ACQUISITION WILL PROVIDE BENEFIT TO PRIVATE PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS BY RESOLVING LONG TERM ACCESS LIMITATIONS NEAR THE CUL DE SAC AND OFFERING FAIR COMPENSATION FOR THE AFFECTED PROPERTIES. THIS RESOLUTION AUTHORIZES CITY STAFF TO PROCEED WITH ACQUIRING THE NECESSARY RIGHT OF WAY, EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY INTEREST TO ADVANCE THE PROJECT. THIS IS A LIST OF THE PROPERTIES HERE. PROPERTY OWNERS AND THEN THIS IS AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARCELS THAT ARE BEING CONSIDERED. I WILL ADD TO THIS THAT THE PARCELS SHOWN HERE IN RED AND HATCHING, WE'RE INTERESTED IN HAVING A TEMPERATURE TESTING CONVERSATION WITH THOSE OWNERS TO SEE IF THEY'D BE INTERESTED IN A POTENTIAL PURCHASE OF THOSE LOTS. HOWEVER, THERE IS ALSO A RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ELM STREET AND TEXAS THAT WOULD BE NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. WITH THAT. DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? YEAH, I THINK MY MIND MAY BE MORE COMMENTS. I WORRY ABOUT THE TERM PROPERTY INTEREST. I JUST KNOW HOW PROPERTIES WERE ACQUIRED PREVIOUSLY WHEN THE PARK WAS DONE. AND NORMALLY WHEN YOU SEND SOMEBODY OUT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, THEY'RE GIVEN THE LANDOWNER BILL OF RIGHTS. IT'S VERY INTIMIDATING FOR THAT, THAT PROPERTY OWNER TO THINK THAT ULTIMATELY THE CITY CAN TAKE THEIR PROPERTY IF THEY DON'T COOPERATE. SO MY MAIN ISSUE WITH THE ITEM ITSELF WAS KIND OF LINKING THOSE TOGETHER. IF IT'S A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH STREETS, WITH WATER, WITH UTILITIES. IT'S REALLY THE PRIVATE INTEREST AND JUST MAKING SURE HOW WE APPROACH THAT. IF IN TURN THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF THE PARK OR TO USE CDC FUNDS IS TO GO AND ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL PARCELS BECAUSE IT WILL MEET THE PUBLIC NEED. BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE HOW WE DELICATELY HANDLE THAT TO. IN TURN, I DON'T LIKE SAYING YOUR PROPERTY DOESN'T MEET THE VISION OF THE PARK. IF THAT'S THE VISION OF THE PARK, I'D LIKE TO CHANGE THE VISION OF THE PARK IF THEY'RE NOT WILLING SELLERS IS HOW I LAND ON THIS. SO GENERALLY, I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF THE WAY THAT ITEM Q IS WRITTEN. MAYOR, IF THE TERM PROPERTY INTERESTS WAS REMOVED, WOULD THAT WOULD THAT MEET THE CONCERNS THAT YOU'RE ADDRESSING? YEAH, I MEAN, I THINK SO. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE HOW ARE WE APPROACHING? I MEAN, FOR INSTANCE, THE THE WYATT TRACT THERE 904 AND 913. IT'S FOR SALE ON THE MARKET. I MEAN, THAT COULD GO AND BE ACQUIRED TODAY WHEN WE'RE APPROACHING SOMEBODY'S HOMESTEAD, IS THE INTENT TO GO AND PURCHASE THOSE PROPERTIES, OR IS THE INTENT TO JUST OBTAIN RIGHT OF WAY? AND THAT'S IT. I MEAN, I THINK IF WE'RE GOING TO GO AND AND APPROACH THEM, I JUST THINK WE NEED TO BE THOUGHTFUL IN HOW WE

[01:25:01]

DO THAT. WE ABSOLUTELY AGREE. BUT LET ME CLARIFY THAT IF WE ARE APPROACHING A PROPERTY FOR RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION FOR WATERLINE EASEMENTS OR SEWER EASEMENTS, THAT INFORMATION IS CLEARLY RELATED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES THAT 993 ARE ON OPEN MARKET, BUT STAFF DOES NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO EVEN TALK TO THE PEOPLE AND TELL COUNSEL, THIS GIVES US AUTHORITY TO HAVE THOSE DISCUSSIONS. SO IF WE WANT TO GO, CONSIDER BUYING IT.

WE NEED PERMISSION FROM FROM THE COUNCIL TO DO THAT. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT THIS IS.

THE GENERAL PROPERTY INTEREST IS TO SEE IF IF HOW MUCH IT IS, IF IT'S AFFORDABLE AND DOESN'T MEET THE NEEDS OF THE CITY AT THIS TIME. OKAY. DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YEAH, I JUST CLARITY THIS WOULD BE A CONSENT FOR YOU TO GO TALK TO THEM, BUT THEN YOU'D HAVE TO COME BACK AGAIN TO ACTUALLY DO IT, CORRECT? YEAH, I WOULD IF, IF IT WAS EITHER A PURCHASE OR IF CONDEMNATION WOULD NEED IT, THAT'S A COMPLETELY SEPARATE ITEM. I JUST WORRY ABOUT HOW JUST HOW WE PRESENT IT TO THEM. ABSOLUTELY UNDERSTOOD. THIS ONE DOES SAY TO EXECUTE ITS DOCUMENT MORE THAN. RIGHT NOW. THERE'S NO FUNDING SOURCE TIED TO THAT. SO WE WOULD HAVE TO BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL TO SECURE THE FUNDING SOURCE TO IT. OKAY. I MEAN, I THINK AS LONG AS STAFF OR WHOEVER OUR PROPERTY INTEREST IS MAKES IT KNOWN THAT WE'RE NOT AFTER THEIR THEIR PROPERTY THEMSELVES UNLESS THEY'RE WILLING TO ENTERTAIN THAT OR WILLING TO RELOCATE, THEN I THINK I'M OKAY WITH IT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S, IT'S MORE WILLING THAN IT IS FORCEFUL. I MEAN, IF, FOR INSTANCE, I SAW THE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS ON EIGHT, EIGHT, EIGHT, I THINK THEY HAVE A GARAGE THERE IN THE WAY OF WHAT IS NEEDED FOR STREET EXPANSION, BECAUSE IN TURN, IT GETS TOO CLOSE TO THE STREET THAT I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND AS FAR AS THAT PROPERTY OWNER AND WHERE THEY EXIST IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RIGHT OF WAY, GOING FROM A NARROW ASPHALT STREET TO A CURB AND GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET WITH SIDEWALKS, THAT'S A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CONVERSATION. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE BEING RESPECTFUL TO THOSE RESIDENTS WHO SOME OF THEM FEEL LIKE THE CITY AND THE PURCHASES THEY MADE IN THE PAST WEREN'T IN GOOD FAITH. RATHER, HOWEVER THEY FEEL. IF THAT'S TRUE OR NOT, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE RESPECTFUL TO THEM. IN THE FUTURE, THAT MESSAGE WILL BE PASSED TO THE RIGHT OF WAY. ACQUISITION TEAM. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT, I WILL MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM Q. SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND FROM ANDY. IF EVERYBODY WILL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. THIS IS JUST FOR. Q. OKAY, THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. ITEM W ARE PULLED. PLAN TO TAKE NO ACTION. THIS RELATES TO THE ACTION AND CONFLICTS WITH THE TERROR ACTION THAT WAS TAKEN ON THE TERRORIST MEETING THAT STARTED AT 450. AND SO WITH THAT, IF NO ONE ELSE WANTS TO PULL, THEN I WILL LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR CONSENT AGENDA. MOVE TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA. DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, A SECOND FROM BRANDON? IF EVERYBODY WILL CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. WE'RE GOING TO

[VIII.A. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider and act upon an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by zoning approximately three (3) acres to a Planned Development (PD) with Commercial, Office, and Retail (C) district base zoning, and modified development standards; generally located east of KC Robinson Lane and approximately 700 feet south of Sunset Boulevard, within City limits, for 1010 KC Robinson. (Mohan)]

MOVE TO PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ITEMS, A CONDUCT, A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ZONING APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND RETAIL DISTRICT BASE ZONING AND MODIFY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF CASEY ROBINSON LANE AND APPROXIMATELY 700FT SOUTH OF SUNSET BOULEVARD, WITHIN CITY LIMITS FOR 1010.

CASEY ROBINSON. OKAY, THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. THIS ITEM IS A PD ZONING FOR 1010 CASEY ROBINSON. THE PROPERTY IS ROUGHLY IDENTIFIED BY THE RED STAR, GENERALLY IN THE CENTRAL PORTION OF OUR BOUNDARY AND THEN SHOWN IN RED HERE, SPECIFICALLY EAST OF CASEY ROBINSON AND GENERALLY SOUTH OF SUNSET BOULEVARD. SO AS A QUICK BACKGROUND, THIS PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES. IT IS CURRENTLY IN THE CITY LIMITS AND ZONED AGRICULTURE, AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ZONE THIS PROPERTY TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMERCIAL BASED ZONING AND MODIFY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. SO IN TERMS OF THE ENTITLEMENT, THE PROPOSED PD INCLUDES A CONCEPT PLAN AND ALSO SOME BUILDING ELEVATIONS THAT I'LL SHOW IN A COUPLE SLIDES AND OPEN STORAGE AREAS PROPOSED IN THE REAR OF THE SITE, PER THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT YOU'LL SEE IN A SECOND, THE OPEN STORAGE AREA WILL BE SCREENED FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES BY AN EIGHT FOOT PERIMETER WALL, AS WELL AS THE MASONRY WALL SURROUNDING THE OPEN STORAGE AS WELL, AND THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS WILL HAVE BAY DOORS, BUT ONLY IN THE REAR OF THE FACILITY BEHIND THE MASONRY WALLS. SO HERE'S THE CONCEPT. PLAN NORTH, JUST FOR ORIENTATION, IS TO THE RIGHT ON THE SCREEN WITH CASEY ROBINSON ON THE TOP, YOU CAN SEE THE LAYOUT WITH THE PRIMARY BUILDING UP FRONT CLOSER TO CASEY ROBINSON. WITH THE STORAGE IN THE BACK. AGAIN, IT WILL BE SCREENED WITH A MASONRY

[01:30:01]

WALL AROUND THE PERIMETER, AND THE STORAGE AREA ITSELF WILL ALSO BE SCREENED. HERE ARE SOME ELEVATIONS THAT SHOW THE PRIMARY FACADE OFF OF CASEY ROBINSON PRIMARY BRICK AND STONE. AND THEN FOR POLICY CONSIDERATIONS, THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED OFF OF A COLLECTOR.

IT'S JUST SOUTH OF A COMMERCIAL INTERSECTION. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE COMPLIANT WITH OUR DESIGN STANDARDS. AGAIN, THE OPEN STORAGE AREA WILL BE SCREENED WITH OUR REQUIREMENTS.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES HAVE LIMITED POTENTIAL TO DEVELOP WITH ANY OTHER HIGHER, HIGHEST AND BEST USE. AND AGAIN, IT'S ONLY THREE ACRES AND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN SUPPORTS THE REZONING REQUEST AS WELL. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL FIVE ZERO AT THEIR MEETING LAST MONTH. ONE RESIDENT DID SPEAK AND ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TIMING FOR AREA ROADWAYS. AND TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION, IT WAS ABOUT CASEY ROBINSON. IT IS NOT ON THE FUTURE FIVE YEAR CIP, SO IT WOULD BE THE DEVELOPER DRIVEN BASICALLY. AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS PRESENTED. SO I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR THEM. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. WITH THAT I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM A. IT'S 824. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM A? OKAY, NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND OPEN IT UP FOR DISCUSSION. THERE'S NO DISCUSSION AND I LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM A. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM A. OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. DO I HAVE A SECOND? HAVE A SECOND FROM BRANDON. NO FURTHER DISCUSSION AND EVERYBODY WILL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THE MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. CONGRATS, ERIC. I GUESS I TELL A LITTLE STORY REAL QUICK. ERIC WAS, I BELIEVE, THE SECOND BIDDER TO THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING. THAT'S FIVE ACRES THAT WE PURCHASED WHERE THE HOUSE WAS OUT THERE. AND HE MADE THAT KNOWN. ALSO, HE KEEPS GETTING UNLUCKY. J. FRED SMITH IS WHERE HIS CURRENT LOCATION IS, AND THE CITY IS EXPANDING THAT ROADWAY AND TAKING HIS OFFICE, BUILDING OUT THAT HE CURRENTLY OFFICES OUT OF. SO I SAID, IF I EVER SEE ANYTHING, I'LL DEFINITELY HELP YOU GET THAT COMMERCIAL AND FIND IT. AND I'M HAPPY YOU WERE ABLE TO FIND SOMETHING. SO CONGRATULATIONS. ALL RIGHT,

[VIII.B. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider and act upon a request for a Development Agreement on approximately 41 acres of land; generally located at the northeast corner of FM 455 and future J Fred Smith Parkway, within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), for Celina Stone Tract. (Mohan)]

WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM B, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 41 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FM 455 AND FUTURE J. FRED SMITH PARKWAY WITHIN THE ETJ FOR SALINA STONE TRACT. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS EVENING ON THE AGENDA IS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FM 455 AND EXCUSE ME, J FRED SMITH PARKWAY. YOU'LL NOTICE ON THE MAP JUST TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE RED CROSS HATCH IS AN AREA OF DISTURBED SOIL THAT IS LWS TOWING. IF ANYBODY, ANYBODY HAS BEEN DRIVEN OUT THERE, THAT MAY BE A BIT OF A LANDMARK IN TERMS OF WHERE WE'RE AT LOCATED ON THE MAP. SO THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES. IT'S WITHIN THE ETJ IS GOVERNED BY A PRE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT THAT EXPIRES IN AUGUST OF 2035. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ENTITLE THE PROPERTY THROUGH A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WHICH OUTLINES THE FUTURE ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY.

THE ZONING EXHIBIT IS ON THE SCREEN. IT'S A RATHER SIMPLE EXHIBIT BECAUSE WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT ZONING. WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OR ANY SITE PLANS OR LAYOUTS OF THAT NATURE. AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE LW S TOWING, WHICH IS OFF THE PROPERTY, BUT NEAR THE ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTHEAST. THERE'S ALSO A CREEK RUNNING THROUGH THE PROPERTY AS WELL. SO THE PROJECT OVERVIEW IS THAT THE PROPOSAL THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A BASE ZONING OF COMMERCIAL AND ALSO WITH THE FLEXIBILITY TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND USES AS WELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY'S INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IS A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. A LOT OF CITIES WILL DISTINGUISH BETWEEN HEAVY OR LIGHT, OR THEY MAY HAVE 2 OR 3 ZONING DISTRICTS. THE CITY OF SALINA ONLY HAS ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND IS DEFINED AND ONLY ALLOWS FOR LIGHT, CLEAN, INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. WE DO NOT HAVE A BASE ZONING FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. THAT IS BECAUSE THE CITY COUNCIL MUST APPROVE ANY HEAVY INDUSTRIAL THAT COMES INTO THE CITY OF SALINA. SO THERE IS NO BASE ZONING THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR ANY HEAVY OR DIRTY INDUSTRIAL. WITHIN THE CITY OF SALINA. THERE'S A. WITHIN THE AGREEMENT, THERE'S A MINIMUM TEN ACRES OF COMMERCIAL. THAT WOULD BE GENERALLY AT THE HARD CORNER. IT ALSO ALLOWS FOR

[01:35:03]

ONE GAS STATION BY RIGHT. TYPICALLY, A GAS STATION WOULD BE REQUIRED TO COME THROUGH THE CITY COUNCIL FOR AN SUP. GIVEN THAT THIS IS 40 ACRES AT A CORNER, STAFF BELIEVES THAT ASKING FOR ONE GAS STATION AHEAD OF TIME BY RIGHT WOULD ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO PROBABLY BE ABLE TO BE MARKETED QUICKER. THERE'S ALSO A MAXIMUM OF BEING REQUESTED OF TEN ACRES OF SELF STORAGE, NOT BEING NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE AN S, U P, AND IT WOULD ALSO NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE AT THE HARD CORNER, GENERALLY AS A SCREENING DEVICE BETWEEN LW S TOWING AND THE REST OF THE PROPERTY. FOR POLICY CONSIDERATIONS, THIS IS AT THE INTERSECTION OF A FOUR AND SIX LANE. IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR COMMERCIAL AND NON RESIDENTIAL USES. SOME OF THE AREA PROJECTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN OPERATION DO HAVE AN IMPACT ON THIS PROPERTY AND HOW IT CAN DEVELOP.

THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE ONE GAS STATION BY RIGHT, NOR THE ONE STORAGE PROJECT, BECAUSE THE STORAGE PROJECT IS LIMITED IN TERMS OF SIZE, THE CITY'S LIGHT OR THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT MIGHT GIVE SOME CONCERN. BUT GIVEN HOW THE CITY RESTRICTS INDUSTRIAL TO ONLY CLEAN OR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, THE CITY IS NOT DOES NOT HAVE A CONCERN ABOUT THAT LAND USE, AND THE AGREEMENT WILL BRING 40 ACRES INTO THE CITY LIMITS ALONG A PROMINENT CORRIDOR.

WENT THE WRONG DIRECTION. SO AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, THEY RECEIVED A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL IN SEPTEMBER. THERE'S NO PUBLIC FEEDBACK AT THAT TIME.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS PRESENTED AND IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. DUSTIN. ONE OF MY QUESTIONS I SENT AHEAD OF TIME RELATED TO MULTIFAMILY AS IT RELATES TO ONE TO REACH 150,000, THEN IN TURN, YOU COULD GET MULTIFAMILY BY RIGHT IN ANY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. I KNOW WE MADE OUR ZONING ADJUSTMENTS, BUT AS THESE APPLICANTS ARE COMING THROUGH, HOW MUCH DO WE HEDGE AGAINST THAT, KNOWING THAT, I MEAN, THIS NEXT LEGISLATIVE SESSION SAY THERE'S A LOOPHOLE. I MEAN, I KNOW THEY BOUT IT. I HAD OUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE ASK ME ABOUT IT THE LAST TIME I SAW HIM LAST WEEK, BECAUSE HE KNOWS THAT FRISCO DID IT. SO HE KNOWS THAT EVERYBODY DID IT. SO HOW HOW IN TURN CAN WE HEDGE AGAINST THAT IN THIS PROPERTY AND SAY, HEY, WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO TAKE THAT OUT FOR A LAND USE? I MEAN, IS THAT JUST SOMETHING YOU NEED FROM US, OR ARE THOSE DISCUSSIONS THAT YOU'RE HAVING AT A STAFF LEVEL WHEN THEY COME IN ASKING SOMEBODY TO DEED RESTRICT OUT MULTIFAMILY IF THEY PROPOSE COMMERCIAL? THAT'S A THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. TODAY, THE CITY'S ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS ARE PROTECTED OR PROTECT THE CITY. HOWEVER, AS WE DO KNOW, THE LEGISLATURE MEETS EVERY TWO YEARS AND COULD CHANGE THE RULES OF THE GAME. SO IN TERMS OF STAFF, WE WOULD WE WOULD DEFINITELY WANT TO RECEIVE THAT DIRECTION IN ORDER TO PROACTIVELY HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS WITH WITH APPLICANTS. OKAY. MAYOR AND COUNCIL, IF I COULD ADD TO THAT, IT IS POSSIBLE TO PUT WITHIN AGREEMENTS A WAIVER OF THOSE STATUTORY RIGHTS. HOWEVER, THE THE WAIVER WOULD ONLY BE GOOD FOR THE LENGTH OF THE AGREEMENT. THE AGREEMENTS ARE GOOD FOR TEN YEARS OR NOT THAT I UNDERSTAND THAT FIVE YEARS. I DON'T THINK THIS ONE IS THAT LONG, BUT. IT IS ANOTHER WAY TO ADDRESS IT. SO IT'S THAT IS THAT SOMETHING I MEAN, WE CAN ASK FOR WITHIN THIS PARCEL? IS THAT SOMETHING WHERE YOU RECOMMEND IT BE TABLED? I DON'T REALLY WANT TO NEGOTIATE FROM THE DAIS WITH THE APPLICANT, BUT IS THAT SOMETHING WE CAN MAKE A MOTION AND THEN IF THEY'RE AMENABLE TO IT, THEN IN TURN THEY COME BACK AND IN TURN, THE PROPERTY DOESN'T HAVE MULTIFAMILY ALLOWABLE USES. IT'S JUST WHAT WE LIST HERE COMMERCIAL, RETAIL, LIGHT, INDUSTRIAL. I THINK IF IF IT'S COUNCIL'S EXPECTATION THAT EACH PROJECT THAT WANTS NON THAT WANTS NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING IS FOR THOSE PROJECTS TO VOLUNTARILY RESTRICT THEIR PROPERTY, TO NOT HAVE MULTIFAMILY, I'D HAVE TO LOOK AT JULIE, BUT I IMAGINE IF THAT'S IF THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN LEGALLY DO, THEN WE CAN MAKE THAT ROUTINE AND BOILERPLATE MOVING FORWARD. I MEAN, CITY, DO ANY OF Y'ALL HAVE ANY FEEDBACK OR ISSUE WITH THAT? AS FOR JUST. GOOD, I LIKE, I THOUGHT MAYBE I MISUNDERSTOOD THAT LAST LEGISLATIVE SESSION, BUT I THOUGHT THAT IF SOMETHING WENT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, THEN THEY COULDN'T DO MULTIFAMILY ON IT. ISN'T THAT CORRECT? SO WE MADE A A TEXTUAL CHANGE WHERE IN TURN, IF IT IF IT HAS A HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE. SO IN TURN, IN OUR CHART, THEN WE PUT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. AS YOU CAN EXPLAIN IT BETTER THAN ME. YEAH. SO MISTER COUNCIL MEMBER GRUMBLES THE THAT WE'RE FINE

[01:40:01]

FOR TODAY, BUT THE 2027 LEGISLATURE BEGINS SOON AND WE CANNOT NECESSARILY ANTICIPATE WHAT THE FINAL END RESULT WILL BE. BUT I DO KNOW THAT THAT THAT THAT REGULATION IS LOOKING TO BE STRENGTHENED. SO IT'S POSSIBLE THAT WHATEVER FORTIFICATIONS SOME CITIES HAVE MADE IN THE MEANTIME, THE STATE MAY TAKE A MORE AGGRESSIVE APPROACH AND COUNTER, YOU KNOW, COUNTER THOSE FORTIFICATIONS. SO WE'RE WE'RE OKAY UNTIL 150,000. AND THEN AFTER THAT, WE HAVE TO SEE IF THE STATE LEGISLATURE HAS MADE ANY CHANGES UP UNTIL THAT POINT.

IT'S REALLY WHERE WE LIE TODAY. YEAH. AND THEY WILL MAKE CHANGES. AND SO THAT'S IN TURN, WE'RE ZONING A PROPERTY TO IN TURN BE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, BE COMMERCIAL, BE OFFICE. AND THEN THE STATE LEGISLATURE THEN ALLOWS ANOTHER USE. AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE BATTLING AGAINST. IF I'M HEARING THE MAYOR'S CONCERN, WE POTENTIALLY COULD ADD THAT A REQUIREMENT INTO THE AGREEMENT THAT THE APPLICANT, THE APPLICANT VOLUNTARILY DID RESTRICT THEIR PROPERTY FROM MULTIFAMILY. THEY HAVEN'T REQUESTED NOR DISCUSSED MULTIFAMILY WITH THIS WITH THIS AGREEMENT, THEY'RE ASKING FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL. SO IF THE APPLICANT WAS WILLING TO DO THAT, THEN THAT IS SHOULD BE A VERY QUICK LINE ITEM WITHIN THE AGREEMENT.

AND I IMAGINE COUNCIL COULD MAKE THE MOTION ACCORDINGLY. YEAH, I'LL JUST MAKE THAT. HOW ABOUT THIS? I'LL JUST I WILL MOTION TO TABLE ITEM B AND WE'LL JUST BRING IT BACK NEXT MONTH. SURE. AND THEN WE CAN CORRECT THE LANGUAGE. WE DON'T HAVE TO MAKE ANY SPECIFIC MOTION. WE'LL JUST TABLE IT AND DISCUSS IT NEXT MONTH. SECOND. OKAY, I HAVE A SECOND. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? YEAH. IT WAS THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED. OH NO, IT WAS NOT. NO. OKAY.

LET ME OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM B. THANK YOU. JULIE, IT'S 835. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? THANK YOU. MAYOR AND COUNCIL CONNOR NICHOLS 312 WEST MAIN STREET REPRESENTING THE DEVELOPER ON THIS. I'M JUST GETTING A CLARIFICATION. SO WE DID BRING THIS AS A MULTIFAMILY SMALL SLIVER STAFF INDICATED TO US THAT'S COMPLETELY OFF THE TABLE, ASKED ME TO GO TO COMMERCIAL. SO I'VE ALREADY GONE THROUGH THIS ITERATION, CHANGED IT TO COMMERCIAL TO GET TO THIS POINT. AT THIS POINT, IF THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO ASK ME TO DO, THAT'S FINE. I JUST WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE'VE ALREADY GONE THROUGH THIS ITERATION ONCE AND HAD THIS DISCUSSION. SO BEFORE YOU MAKE YOUR DECISION, JUST WANTED TO GIVE THAT INPUT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM B? ALL RIGHT. WHAT EXACTLY WHY WOULD WE BE TABLING IT AT THIS POINT? I MEAN, I JUST I THINK PHILOSOPHICALLY, I DON'T WANT TO NEGOTIATE OR PUT SOMEBODY IN AN AWKWARD POSITION PASSING IT, ASKING THEM TO MAKE AN AMENDED APPROVAL UNLESS THEY REQUEST IT FROM THE DAIS. NORMALLY, IT'S BETTER FOR THEM TO BE COMFORTABLE, HAVE THEIR REPRESENTATION, REVIEW IT, AND THEN COME BACK THE FOLLOWING MONTH. BECAUSE AS OF RIGHT NOW, WE'RE ASKING THEM TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT FROM HERE FIRST, ALLOWING THEM TO SEE THE THE TEXT LANGUAGE AND EVERYTHING PREPARED AHEAD OF TIME. ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT? I GUESS? YEAH, I MEAN, I KIND OF FEEL LIKE WE'RE MAKING THEM WAIT IF THEY'VE ALREADY IF THEY'VE ALREADY KIND OF GONE THROUGH THIS AND PULLED THE MULTIFAMILY OFF, I MAYBE I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED AS TO WHY WE WOULD PUSH IT TO ANOTHER MONTH. I THINK THE, THE QUESTION IS NOT ABOUT NOW AND NOT ABOUT CONNOR'S WORK THAT HE'S DONE. IT'S JUST DOWN THE ROAD THIS. WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THE OLD.

IT'S A DIFFERENT SET OF OWNERS. THEN WE REACH 150,000 OR THE STATE CHANGES THE RULES WHICH THEY ARE LIKELY TO DO. THEN IF IT'S NOT DEED RESTRICTED, MULTIFAMILY COULD JUST BY RIGHT BE PUT ON THERE. SO I THINK WE MAKE SURE THAT LEGAL HAS THE PROPER LANGUAGE INSIDE OF THE AGREEMENT. AND THEN IT'S BROUGHT BACK TO. OKAY, OKAY, THAT OKAY, SO I DID, I BELIEVE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE DO HAVE A, A MOTION TO. TABLE. THIS IS TABLE TO THE NOVEMBER 10TH MEETING. I'LL MOTION TO TABLE. HAVE A SECOND AGAIN ANDY. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A SECOND FROM ANDY. AND THEN IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, IF EVERYBODY WILL, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THE MOTION TO TABLE CARRIES 7 TO 0. ITEM C, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO

[VIII.C. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider and act upon a request for a Development Agreement on approximately 98 acres of land; generally located east of future Custer Road and approximately 1,800 feet north of future Ousley Boulevard, within both the City limits and the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), for Cordoba Estates. (Mohan)]

[01:45:09]

CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 98 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF FUTURE CUSTER ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1800FT NORTH OF FUTURE HOUSLEY BOULEVARD. WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND THE ETJ FOR CORDOBA STATES. I DO HAVE A NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT REQUESTED TO TABLE. DO YOU STILL WANT TO GO THROUGH THE PRESENTATION? I THINK WE CAN, WHICHEVER YOU PREFER. I DON'T KNOW IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING SINCE THEY REQUESTED THE TABLING, SO WE CAN WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.

OKAY. WELL THEN WE'LL WE'LL THEN I WILL MOTION TO TABLE ITEM C UNTIL THE NOVEMBER 10TH MEETING AT 5 P.M. 5 P.M. I HAVE A SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND FROM PHILIP FOR EVERYBODY WILL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THE MOTION TO TABLE PASSES 7 TO 0. MOVE TO ITEM D, CONDUCT A

[VIII.D. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider and act upon an Ordinance amending the City’s Code of Ordinances, by amending Chapter 14: Zoning, Article 14.02: Zoning Districts, Part Four: Non-Residential Zoning Districts, Article 14.03: Use Regulations, Part One: Schedule of Uses, and related sections of the Zoning Ordinance, to amend agricultural regulations. (McAfee)]

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING CHAPTER 14 ZONING. ARTICLE 14.02 ZONING DISTRICTS PART FOUR NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. ARTICLE 14.03 USE REGULATIONS PART ONE SCHEDULE OF USES AND RELATED SECTIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE TO AMEND AGRICULTURAL REGULATIONS. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS EVENING WE'RE TAKING ACTION TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH A NEW STATE LAW, SB 785 THAT WENT INTO WENT INTO EFFECT ON SEPTEMBER 1ST. IT BASICALLY REQUIRES CITIES TO HAVE A ZONING DISTRICT ON THE BOOKS THAT ALLOWS FOR ESSENTIALLY A MANUFACTURED HOME. IT ALSO REQUIRES THE CITY TO HAVE THAT ZONING DISTRICT ZONED TO THE DIRT WITHIN THE CITY. SO, SOLANA, WE HAVE A ZONING DISTRICT, A MANUFACTURED HOME ZONING DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES. HOWEVER, THAT'S NOT ZONED TO THE GROUND ANYWHERE IN THE CITY. SO IN ORDER TO BE IN COMPLIANCE, WE HAVE TO HAVE A ZONING DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS FOR A MANUFACTURED HOME. THE GOOD NEWS IS, IS THAT SOLANA DOES HAVE ALREADY A ZONING DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME. THAT IS THE AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT. IF YOU HAVE 80 ACRES OF LAND ZONED AGRICULTURE, YOU ARE LEGALLY ALLOWED AND HAVE BEEN LEGALLY ALLOWED TO PLACE ONE MOBILE HOME ONE, NOT MANY. THAT WOULD BE A SUBDIVISION ONE ON YOUR ACREAGE. AND THAT THAT IS ALLOWED BY RIGHT TODAY, YESTERDAY, AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN ALLOWED, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THE TEXT OF THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT GRANTS THAT ALLOWANCE AND ENTITLEMENT. SO WE ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AS WE ARE TODAY. HOWEVER, THE CITY ATTORNEY ADVISED THAT THE AG DISTRICT, WHICH EXISTS BOTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE AND IN THE GROUND, COULD BE BETTER CLARIFIED BY UPDATING THE LAND USE CHART TABLE WITHIN THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALSO CLEARLY DEPICT THE RIGHT THAT IS CURRENTLY GRANTED BY THE TEXT OF THE AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT. SO WHAT WE MEAN BY THAT IS THIS IS A SNIPPET OF THE USE CHART WITHIN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. IT LISTS ALL THE POSSIBLE LAND USES. THIS IS AGAIN JUST A SMALL PORTION OF IT WITHIN THE CITY. AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS ARE ON TOP IN THE COLUMNS. AND WE ARE SIMPLY ADDING A P FOR MANUFACTURED HOME, WHICH MEANS ALLOWED, AND THAT THAT P IS ALREADY ALLOWED TODAY IN THE TEXT. SO THAT'S JUST A REFLECTION OF TODAY'S ENTITLEMENT. IT'S NOT A CHANGE.

AND WHILE WE HAD THIS AREA CRACKED OPEN, WE DECIDED TO ALSO PUT A P FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOME BECAUSE YOU CAN YOU CAN BUILD A HOME ON ACREAGE TODAY. AGAIN, THAT'S ALLOWED BY THE TEXT, BUT IT WAS NOT DEPICTED IN THE CHART ACCORDINGLY. SO WHILE WE WERE MAKING THIS CHANGE, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE WERE ABOVE AND BEYOND WITH MAKING SURE WE UPDATE THE ORDINANCES TO REFLECT EVERYTHING PROPERLY. FOR POLICY CONSIDERATIONS. THIS BECAME LAW, THIS SENATE BILL, AND ON SEPTEMBER 1ST, THE AG DISTRICT ALREADY GRANTS THESE ENTITLEMENTS. SO IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A CHANGE. BUT THIS DOES MAKE OUR ZONING ORDINANCE MORE WHOLE, MORE COMPLETE, POTENTIALLY LESS CONFUSING FOR THOSE WHO GO TO THE TABLE BEFORE THEY GO TO THE TEXT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. ALSO, THERE ARE SOME OTHER OPTIONS.

WE COULD HAVE ZONED TO THE DIRT, THE MANUFACTURED HOME ZONING DISTRICT SOMEPLACE, BUT WE AS STAFF DID NOT BELIEVE THAT WOULD REFLECT THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY. AT THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION, WHICH UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT, THERE IS NO PUBLIC FEEDBACK, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS PRESENTED, AND

[01:50:04]

WE'RE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AS WELL. QUESTIONS? THANKS, DUSTY. ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 843. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM D? OKAY. IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM D AND LOOK FOR A MOTION. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM SHAY. DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND FROM ANDY. EVERYBODY, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. WE'RE

[IX.A. Consider and act to authorize a ten-year agreement for bodycams, dashcams, tasers, drones, pole cameras, and software for the Celina Police Department from Axon Enterprise through a cooperative agreement with Buyboard, contract #743-24, for an amount not to exceed $9,958,384.26. (Cullison)]

GOING TO MOVE TO ACTION ITEMS A CONSIDER AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE A TEN YEAR AGREEMENT FOR BODY CAMS, DASH CAMS, TASERS, DRONES, POLE CAMERA AND SOFTWARE FOR THE SALINA POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM AXON ENTERPRISE THROUGH A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH BY BOARD CONTRACT NUMBER 743-24, FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $9,958,384.26. CHIEF, HOW ARE YOU? I'M DOING GOOD. HOW ARE YOU DOING? GOOD. EXCELLENT. MAYOR. COUNCIL. THANK YOU. IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE BEFORE YOU GUYS AND HAVE A CONVERSATION. AND THIS IS A FOCUS ON AXON CONTRACT. IT'S A TEN YEAR RENEWAL RIGHT NOW. WE ARE TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND. WE'RE IN THE FIFTH YEAR OF OUR CONTRACT WITH AXON. AXON HAS BEEN AN EXCEPTIONAL VENDOR WHO WE'RE VERY PLEASED WITH, WHO DELIVERS ON TIME AND ALSO IS A GREAT SUPPORTER OF WHENEVER WE NEED TECH HELP AND SO FORTH. SO IT'S A PLEASURE TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH THEM. HOPEFULLY, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. OOPS. IS IT THIS ONE RIGHT HERE? OKAY, THERE WE GO. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S CURRENT AXON CONTRACT IS EXPIRING SOON. WE USE BODY CAMS, TASER SEVEN DASH CAMS. WE ALSO HAVE EVIDENCE.COM. AND ALSO WE HAVE EVIDENCE ROOM. WE HAVE ROOMS WHERE WE DO OUR INTERVIEWS AS WELL. AND THOSE ARE ALL ON THE AXON AXON ECOSYSTEM. THIS NEW TEN YEAR CONTRACT WITH AXON WILL NOT ONLY INCLUDE NEW PRODUCTS, BUT LOCK IN 2026 PRICING FOR THE LIFE OF THE CONTRACT. THE CONTRACT INCLUDES A GROWTH PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY TEN SWORN OFFICERS A YEAR, ALONG WITH FIVE DASH CAM SYSTEMS FOR FIVE NEW PATROL VEHICLES A YEAR.

AGAIN, THIS CONTINUED GROWTH OF THE CITY. THIS KEEP PACE WITH THAT OUR CIVILIAN PRO LICENSE ARE ISSUED ON NEEDED BASIS AND THAT IS OUR REDACTION, OUR TRANSCRIPTION CASE MANAGEMENT AND ALSO CONDUCTING AUDIT TRAILS. AND AGAIN, THIS IS JUST A BIG PART OF WHAT WE ALREADY DO WITH OUR AXON SYSTEM. AND SO NEW PRODUCTS WILL INCLUDE BODY CAM WITH AI SOFTWARE. AXON TRANSLATE FANTASTIC FEATURE ABOUT 47 LANGUAGES WHICH YOU CAN TRANSLATE RIGHT HERE FROM YOUR BODY WORN CAMERA. IF YOU'RE SPEAKING TO ME IN MANDARIN CHINESE, I SIMPLY HIT THE BUTTON. IT LISTENS TO WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY AND THEN TRANSLATES BACK. AND SO WE CAN UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER. EXCELLENT SYSTEM. WE ALREADY TEST DROVE THAT AND IT WAS IT CAME INTO PLAY. AS YOU KNOW, IN EVERY AREA OF DFW, PEOPLE SPEAK A LOT OF DIFFERENT LANGUAGES AND IT REALLY IS HELPFUL TO PEOPLE WHEN THEY NEED POLICE HELP TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO US.

ALSO, AXON POLICY LOOK UP THROUGH BODY CAMS. SO AGAIN, I TOLD HER TO CHANGE THAT TYPO, SHOULDN'T POINT OUT TYPOS. NONETHELESS, AXON POLICY LOOK UP IS AN EXCELLENT TOOL AS WELL.

IMAGINE YOU'RE OUT ON A SCENE. YOU GET INTO A CHALLENGING SITUATION. YOU'RE LOOKING FOR GUIDANCE. YOU CAN SIMPLY GET YOUR POLICY RIGHT ON YOUR BODY CAM. AN AMAZING OPPORTUNITY.

ALSO AXON LIVE VIEW AND TWO WAY COMMUNICATION. THAT IS SAY FOR EXAMPLE, YOU HAVE A DEVELOPING CIRCUMSTANCE GOING ON. OFFICERS ARE OUT IN THE FIELD. YOU AS A SUPERVISOR OR EVEN THE CHIEF CAN PULL UP LIVE AND WATCH WHAT'S GOING ON. SUPERVISOR CAN SPEAK DIRECTLY TO THE OFFICERS ON THE SCENE IN CASE ANY GUIDANCE, INPUT AND SO FORTH. SO IT'S A GREAT FORCE MULTIPLIER. AND AGAIN, THE LOCATION SERVICES IS EXCELLENT TOOL AS WELL. THAT IS WHEN YOUR BODY WORN CAMERA IS ACTIVATED. WE KNOW WHERE YOU ARE. SO IF YOU GET INTO A DIFFICULT SITUATION YOU'RE IN A FOOT PURSUIT. WE DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU ARE. YOUR BODY WORN CAMERA WILL BE ABLE TO TRACK YOU FROM THAT. THE TASER TEN THIS IS A NEW GENERATION OF TASER ALLOWS FOR MULTIPLE DEPLOYMENTS, BETTER CONNECTIVITY, AND SAFER DEPLOYMENTS. AGAIN, LESS THAN LETHAL TOOLS. WHERE ARE THEY ABOUT SAVING LIVES WHILE STILL BEING ABLE TO DO OUR JOB? AND THIS IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL AND WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS. DASH CAMS CURRENT FLEET THREE ITERATION. WE UTILIZE THE LICENSE PLATE READERS THAT HAS BEEN IN VEHICLES, POLICE VEHICLES ALL OVER THE NATION FOR THE LAST 25 YEARS OR SO. WE'LL CONTINUE WITH THAT VR TRAIN SIMULATOR. AGAIN, A BIG A BIG ASPECT OF POLICING TO BE REALLY GOOD AT WHAT WE DO. YOU NEED GOOD TRAINING. AND SO THE VR TRAIN SIMULATOR HAS MULTIPLE, MANY, MANY SCENARIOS WE CAN RUN THROUGH. AND THESE ARE A GREAT WAY TO WORK ON DE-ESCALATION, LESS THAN LETHAL DEADLY FORCE TRANSITIONS AND ASSIST WITH QUALIFICATIONS AND THEN DRONES. SO THIS IS THE NEW BEGINNING.

[01:55:03]

WE ALREADY HAVE DRONES OUT ON PATROL, BUT HE'S BEEN ON PATROL FOR PROBABLY 15 YEARS. BUT DRONE IS THE FIRST RESPONDERS. OUR NEXT GOAL. AND THAT IS WE'LL HAVE LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. GIVE US A BIRD'S EYE VIEW OF SITUATIONS IF NEED BE, AND CAN RESPOND FASTER IN MANY TIMES, MANY INSTANCES, EVEN AN OFFICER. IT ALSO JUST GIVES YOU THAT ABILITY. ON SOME ROUTINE CALLS, SAY AN ALARM CALL, AN OFFICER IS NOT AVAILABLE. YOU JUST SEND A DRONE OUT AND YOU CAN LOOK AT THE ENTIRE BUILDING AND CLEAR IT. UNKNOWN OR FALSE ALARM THREE DEPLOYABLE DEPLOYABLE PATROL DRONES THAT WAS SENT OUT OUR FLEET. ALSO. THIS GIVES US A CONSISTENT TYPE OF DRONE PLATFORM WE'RE USING. AND ALSO YOU GET ALL THE SUPPORT THAT AXON PROVIDES WITH THAT. AND FINALLY CAMERAS, THESE ARE CAMERAS WE CAN USE. FOR EXAMPLE, WE HAVE HIGH THEFT AREAS, CONSTRUCTION THEFTS. THEY HAPPEN ALL OVER THE CITY. WE CAN DEPLOY THESE OUT THERE IN THAT LOCATION AND SEE LIVE WHAT'S GOING ON. MUCH LIKE YOU SEE WHEN PEOPLE PUT THE PORTABLE TRAILERS OUT THERE, IT'S THE SAME THING. ALSO IN HIGH RETAIL AREAS, LET'S SAY YOU HAVE CARS BEING STOLEN OR MOTOR VEHICLES. YOU CAN DEPLOY THOSE CAMERAS. SO IT'S A GREAT TOOL. IT GIVES US FLEXIBILITY. FUZES. THAT'S WHERE WE PULL EVERYTHING TOGETHER. SO IMAGINE LIKE ONE WINDOW PANE. AND SO EVERYTHING THAT'S GOING ON OUT THERE WITH BODY CAMERAS, DASH CAMS, LICENSE PLATE READERS, DRONE FOOTAGE. ALL THOSE THINGS ARE SEPARATE PIECES, SEPARATE THINGS GOING ON. BUT THIS PULLS IT ALL TOGETHER IN ONE PLATFORM. SO LET'S SAY I'M IN DISPATCH OR WE'RE IN A COMMAND CENTER. I CAN SEE EVERYTHING. I CAN SEE THE OFFICER BAILS OUT OF THE VEHICLE TO GO ON A FOOT PURSUIT. I CAN SEE ON HIS BODY WORN CAMERAS WHAT'S GOING ON? WE LAUNCHED A DRONE. I CAN SEE ANOTHER PAIN, EXACTLY WHAT'S HAPPENING. AND THEN ALSO I CAN LOOK AT HIS IN-CAR VIDEO AND SEE, LET'S SAY WE LEAVE TWO OTHER SUSPECTS IN THE CAR. I CAN SEE WHAT THEY'RE DOING. SO THEN WHEN THE NEXT ARRIVING OFFICERS ARE ON SCENE, THEY HAVE GOOD SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. THAT'S AN OFFICER SAFETY ISSUE. IT'S AN EXCELLENT TOOL. THIS ALLOWS CRIME CENTER PERSONNEL TO AGAIN, GET QUICK ACCESS TO WHAT'S GOING ON IN A MULTITUDE OF SITUATIONS, WHETHER IT'S ROUTINE POLICE OPERATIONS OR IT'S A HIGH RISK SITUATION. AND THEN AI REPORTING AGAIN, JUST LIKE MANY OTHER ENTITIES, YOU KNOW, AI IS BECOMING A TOOL THAT CAN HELP WRITE THE REPORTS. IT'S BASED UPON THE ACTUAL WHAT'S ON YOUR BODY WORN CAMERA, NOT WHAT YOU'RE SEEING. SO I CAN TAKE THAT AND HELP YOU TRANSCRIBE THAT INTO AN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE. WHAT HAPPENED? IT ALSO HAS FAILSAFE SYSTEMS IN PLACE WHERE YOU CAN PUT THINGS LIKE, YOU KNOW, SPOTTED OWL WAS AT THE LOCATION THAT'S GOING TO TRICK YOU TO KNOW YOU SHOULD BE CHECKING YOUR REPORT MORE THOROUGHLY. THAT WAY. WE'RE MAKING SURE OFFICERS ARE DOING WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING, BUT IT'S A GOOD TOOL. AND WHY IS THAT IMPORTANT? IT CUTS DOWN THE TIME THEY'RE SITTING THERE WRITING REPORTS. THEY CAN GO BACK AND DO POLICE WORK INSTEAD OF WRITING REPORTS, REDACTION SOFTWARE, WE CONSISTENTLY GET OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS. IT'S QUITE A FEW, AND EVERY ONE OF THOSE. IF I GET AN OPEN RECORDS REQUEST FOR A BODY WORN CAMERA AND IT'S A THREE HOUR RECORDING, WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH ALL THREE HOURS. AND SO IMAGINE HOW LONG AND TEDIOUS THAT IS. AND WITH REDACTION SOFTWARE, IT ALLOWS US TO GET TO THAT POINT, DO THE REDACTION AND DO OUR JOB QUICKER. AND THEN A FUTURE USE WILL BE OUR AI 911. THIS IS ALREADY IN PLAY IN SOME OTHER AGENCIES IN THEIR DISPATCH. AND AGAIN, IT HELPS YOU DETERMINE, CATEGORIZE, CATALOG AND, AND DISPATCH CALLS AND ALSO ANSWER CALLS. IT'S A GREAT TOOL THAT WILL EVENTUALLY BE ABLE TO INCORPORATE AS WELL. AND SO THE AGREEMENT WITH AXON WILL BE A TEN YEAR CONTRACT. ESSENTIALLY IT'S BROKEN INTO THREE JUST BECAUSE THAT'S THE WAY THEY STRUCTURE IT. BUT ULTIMATELY WE'RE LOCKING IN OUR 2026 PRICES. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING. AND THEN WE WILL ONLY PAY INCREASES FOR NON-CONTRACTED ADDITIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, IF I GO OVER THE TEN OFFICER THRESHOLD, THEN WE MAY HAVE TO PAY MORE. BUT OUR OUR MODELING LOOKS AT ABOUT THAT AS AN AVERAGE. IF ONE YEAR WE ONLY HIRE SIX OFFICERS AND NEXT YEAR WE HIRE 15. WE GET CREDIT FOR THAT. SO THAT WORKS WELL. THE ENHANCEMENT OUTSIDE THE CONTRACT TERMS WOULD BE A SEPARATE CONTRACT. NEW PRICING, NOT AN ORIGINAL LOCKING IN PRICE. AND AGAIN, THIS GOES INTO THE DISCUSSION ABOUT IF WE DON'T GROW WE CAN USE IT LATER.

SO THE TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE IS $9,958,000. WE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH HARLEY AND HER TEAM AND BUDGET TO NEGOTIATE THIS COME DOWN AT THE BEST PRICE WE CAN. AND AGAIN, THIS IS AN EXCEPTIONAL OPPORTUNITY AND KIND OF GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF SOME OF THE NUMBERS HERE. WITH OUR CONCESSIONS, WE GET ABOUT A 56% DECREASE IN ACTUAL TOTAL COST THAT IT COULD BE PROJECTED, JUST LIKE WHEN YOU BUNDLE, WHEN YOU BUNDLE AND BUY A CABLE OR YOUR CELL PHONE, IT'S THE SAME THING. BUT WHAT WE'RE GETTING TO IS CONSISTENT SUPPORT, REFRESH OF OUR SYSTEMS AND ALSO A QUALITY SYSTEM THAT MOST OF THIS THAT WE HAVE IS STATE UNFUNDED MANDATES. FOR EXAMPLE, WE'RE REQUIRED REQUIRED TO HAVE BODY WORN CAMERAS IN CAR VIDEOS. THE TASER. ALL THESE THINGS WE HAVE TO HAVE. BUT THE STATE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T PROVIDE THE FINANCING FOR THAT. THESE ARE GOOD TOOLS TOO, BUT THEY'RE NECESSITIES. AND ADDITIONALLY, JUST MOVING FORWARD IN POLICING TODAY, TOMORROW, THE NEXT DAY, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT EMBRACING TECHNOLOGY BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT

[02:00:04]

GOOD POLICING IS ABOUT. IF WE CAN BE BETTER AT WHAT WE'RE DOING AND USE THE TECHNOLOGY THAT KEEPS OUR OFFICERS SAFE, KEEPS OUR PUBLIC SAFE, AND ULTIMATELY IT PROVIDES FOR A GOOD OUTCOME. AND AGAIN, THESE ARE JUST THE NUMBERS. WE STRUCTURE THIS IN A WAY THAT IS IT'S AMICABLE TO THE CITY IN REGARDS TO PAYING THIS, THIS. THIS CONTRACT PRICE. AND CARLO WORKED REALLY HARD TO GET THESE NUMBERS AND THESE ARE FIT OUR NEEDS. ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION AS IT RELATES TO YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT 16 DIFFERENT CAMERAS THAT WERE ALPR. WHERE DOES THE THE OVERLAP OR FUNCTIONALITY, WHAT IS IT VERSUS FLOCK THAT WE HAVE TODAY? WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO AND HOW THEY'RE GOING TO BE DEPLOYED AND USED OR JUST THEIR CAPABILITIES IN GENERAL? YEAH, IT COULD ACCENTUATE THE FLOCK SYSTEM, BUT THEY'RE TWO SEPARATE SYSTEMS. YOU KNOW, THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT ENTITIES. IT GIVES US THE FLEXIBILITY TO PUT THEM WHERE WE NEED THEM. AND JUST LIKE I MENTIONED, SOME OF THE SCENARIOS WOULD BE HIGH CRIME AREAS, LARGE THEFTS GOING ON, BIG COMMUNITY EVENTS. THAT'S WHAT ALLOWS US TO USE IT FOR. AND WE WE DECIDE IF WE WANT TO DEPLOY THEM OR NOT. OKAY. SO ARE THOSE ON FIXED POLES ON STREETS OR THEY COULD BE IN TURN. BUT IT'S ALSO IS IT MORE OF THOSE I WANTED TO SAY LIKE EYE IN THE SKY KIND OF DEAL? IS IT ONE OF THOSE BIG GIANT ONES OR THEY'RE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT? IT'S A IT'S A DISCRETE. I MEAN, IT'S NOT THE BIG EYE IN THE SKY.

BUT IT'S NO DIFFERENT WHEN YOU GO DOWN THE D.A. IT'S IT'S RECORDED ENTIRE LENGTH. YOU GO DOWN 183, 114, 635. THE CITIES HAVE LIVE FEEDS, MAJOR INTERSECTIONS, DOWNTOWN AREAS.

YOU GO DOWNTOWN DALLAS, THERE'S PROBABLY NOWHERE YOU'RE NOT ON SOME KIND OF VIDEO BECAUSE IT'S ALL ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY. AND THAT'S WHY IT'S GOOD TO HAVE THAT TOOL IF WE NEED IT. WE DON'T HAVE TO DEPLOY IT EITHER. SO THEY'RE RELATIVELY MOVABLE. YOU COULD DECIDE AFTER A COUPLE OF MONTHS, IF IT'S NOT NEEDED AT THAT SITE, YOU COULD MOVE IT TO ANOTHER SITE. YES. MORE SO THAN THE LOCK SYSTEM. YES. ANYTHING ELSE? NO. OKAY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. I BROUGHT THESE TWO GUYS UP HERE BECAUSE THEY'RE A NEW DEPUTY CHIEF AND ASSISTANT CHIEF, AND THEY NEED TO FILL IT. HE BROUGHT THE MUSCLE TODAY. THAT'S MY MUSCLE RIGHT THERE.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, THEN I WILL LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM A. MOTION TO APPROVE A SECOND. MOTION. AND I HAVE A SECOND. NO DISCUSSION. THEN EVERYBODY, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. WE'LL

[IX.B. Consider and act to authorize Amendment 5 to add to the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for additional Owner Contingency supplemental items from the Construction Manager At Risk, Swinerton Builders, in an amount not to exceed $495,357.50. (Brawner)]

MOVE TO ITEM B. CONSIDER AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE AMENDMENT FIVE TO ADD TO THE GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE FOR ADDITIONAL OWNER CONTINGENCY. SUPPLEMENTAL ITEMS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK SWINERTON BUILDERS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $495,357.50. GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. OKAY. WE ARE HERE TO DISCUSS A GUARANTEED GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN CENTER WITH A CONTRACT WITH SWINERTON. WE'RE BUILDING A BUILDING. I BET EVERYBODY KNEW THAT. EVEN DOWNTOWN. AGAIN, WE ALL KNEW THAT. WE STARTED THIS PROJECT WITH A GMP AMOUNT OF $79 MILLION. WHEN WE BID THIS PROJECT, WE BID IT AT A 50% PLAN SET THAT WAS PART OF THE CHALLENGE IS TO BID IT AND GET A BETTER PRICE, WEIGHT AND HAVE THE PRICES ESCALATE. WHEN WE BID THE PROJECT, WE BID IT WITH A 5% CONTINGENCY. NORMALLY WE BID OUR PROJECTS. WE DO 8 TO 10% AS A STANDARD PRACTICE. WE WERE TRYING TO BE VERY RESPONSIBLE WITH FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. AS WE'VE PROGRESSED TO THE 100% DESIGN PACKAGE AND INTO IT, THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL MODIFICATIONS THAT HAVE COME TO FRUITION THROUGH THE PLAN SET, AND WE USED A CONTINGENCY AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. WE HAVE WE ARE AT THE LIMIT OF CONTINGENCY.

WE HAVE NO CONTINGENCY LEFT IN THE PROJECT. SO WHAT WE'RE ASKING IS FOR ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE FOR TO INCREASE THE CONTINGENCY. WE HAVE SEVERAL ITEMS SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSED, AND WE CAN GO INTO THESE AS MUCH DETAIL AS YOU NEED. BUT FIRE ADDITIONAL SCOPES ARE $46,000. THERE ARE SOME CHANGES THAT THE FIRE MARSHAL OFFICE HAS REQUESTED. WE HAVE SPECIALIZED SPRINKLER HEADS OVER OUR GENERATOR BECAUSE IT'S A NATURAL GAS GENERATOR. CODE REQUIRES A DIFFERENT SPRINKLER HEADS WE HADN'T PLANNED ON. YOU CAN SEE THEY'RE VERY, RELATIVELY MINOR CHANGES. THE AC FIVE DRAWINGS, THOSE ARE CHANGES DUE TO A FIRE ALARM SUBMITTAL. AGAIN, THESE ARE DESIGN CHANGES THAT HAVE HAPPENED. FACILITIES AS WE'VE GONE THROUGH WE'VE MADE SOME CHANGES. ELEVATOR DOOR HEIGHT. WE RAISED FROM 6FT TO 8FT. AS WE'RE MOVING EQUIPMENT IN AND OUT. WE'VE ADDED A URETHANE PROTECTIVE COATING ON RESTROOM

[02:05:03]

FLOORS AND TRASH ENTRANCE MODIFICATIONS. SO WHEN WE ROLL OUT THE DUMPSTERS, OUR FACILITIES DOESN'T HAVE TO JUMP OVER THE CURB ALL THE TIME. THOSE ARE THE KINDS OF CHANGES WE'VE MADE. ATRIUM. STAIR TREADS. WE TALKED TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. WE HAVE BEAUTIFUL WOOD STAIRS COMING DOWN, BUT MCKINNEY SAID THEY HAD A PROBLEM. THEY HAD THE SAME KIND OF STAIRS, AND THEY HAD TO GO BACK IN AND ROUTE A VISUAL IMPAIRMENT TO, SO PEOPLE WOULD SEE WHERE THE STAIRS ENDED AFTER THEY OPENED THE BUILDING. SO WE WERE DOING THAT BEFORE WE OPENED OUR BUILDING. WE ARE ADDING A SOME HVAC CHANGES THROUGH CLIMATIC ADDED SECURITY CHANGES IN THE BASEMENT. THESE ARE JUST CHAIN LINK FENCES TO SECURE THINGS LIKE IT EQUIPMENT AND FINANCIAL RECORDS, THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THEN SOME STORM SEWER MODIFICATIONS. TECHNOLOGY IS 162,000. THIS IS THE LARGEST ONE YOU CAN SEE THE CHANGES. TECHNOLOGY IS ALWAYS THE LAST THING TO BE FINISHED. THERE ARE ADDITIONAL CONDUITS THERE, ADDITIONAL SECURITY CAMERAS, WIRELESS ACCESS POINTS AND THE LIST GOES ON. THAT IS THE FINAL SET OF PLANS TO FINISH AS A BUILDING PROJECT GOES TO CONSTRUCTION. SO IN ADDITION, WE HAVE 175,000 OF THOSE. YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCES. THE LARGEST ONE IS A ROOFTOP EXTERIOR. VIDEO WALL. VIDEO WALL. WE HAVE LOOKED WHEN WE INITIALLY PROJECTED THIS, EVERYBODY SEEN THE PICTURE WITH THE WIZARD OF OZ ON THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. WE INITIALLY DESIGNED THAT WITH A PROJECTOR SYSTEM ON IT. AFTER LOOKING AT THE. AGAIN FINISHED FINALIZING OUR TECHNOLOGY. THE COST TO CREATE A PROJECTOR THAT IS HIGH ENOUGH RESOLUTION TO SEE OUTSIDE DURING THE DAYTIME WAS SIGNIFICANT. SO WHEN OUR IT DEPARTMENT LOOKED AT THE OPTIONS, THEY SUGGESTED WE GO TO A VIDEO WALL, WHICH WILL ALLOW EVERYBODY TO SEE THE SCREEN OUTSIDE. YOU CAN SEE THAT IS A VERY HEALTHY EXTERIOR VIDEO WALL. IT ALSO INCLUDES STRUCTURAL CHANGES. IT'S A 12,000 POUND VIDEO WALL. SO WE HAD TO DO SOME SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO ACCOMMODATE IT. THE TOTAL GMP AMENDMENT, AS YOU CAN SEE, IS $495,000 AND SOME CHANGE. THIS WILL FINISH OUT THE PROJECT AND WE WILL BE. THE FUNDING IS AVAILABLE IN THE PROJECT. TODAY.

I WILL AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS. QUESTIONS. WHEN DO YOU GET THE KEYS? DO WHAT? WHEN DO YOU GET THE KEYS TO THE BUILDING? I DON'T KNOW, ASK ME WHEN THE WINDOWS ARE INSTALLED. THAT'S WHAT I KEEP TELLING EVERYBODY. WE WERE WAITING FOR CLIMATISATION. WE HAVE A LOT OF WINDOWS TO INSTALL, SO ASK ME AFTER WE GET THE WINDOWS INSTALLED. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR ITEM B. MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM B. I HAVE A MOTION. DO I HAVE A SECOND? HAVE A SECOND. EVERYBODY PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM C. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON

[IX.C. Consider and act upon a Resolution of the City of Celina, Texas, determining the costs of certain authorized improvements to be financed within Improvement Area #3 of the Edgewood Creek Public Improvement District; approving a preliminary amended service and assessment plan, including a proposed Improvement Area #3 Assessment Roll; directing the filing of the proposed Improvement Area #3 Assessment Roll with the City Secretary to make available for public inspection; calling a Public Hearing for November 10, 2026, to consider an Ordinance levying assessments on property located within the Edgewood Creek Public Improvement District; directing City staff to publish and mail notice of such Public Hearing; and resolving other matters incident and related thereto. (Stovall)]

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SALINA, TEXAS. DETERMINING THE COST OF CERTAIN AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FINANCED WITHIN IMPROVEMENT. NUMBER THREE OF THE EDGEWOOD CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AMENDED SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, INCLUDING A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER THREE ASSESSMENT ROLE DIRECTING THE FILING OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREA. NUMBER THREE, ASSESSMENT ROLE WITH THE CITY CITY SECRETARY TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 10TH, 2026 TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE EDGEWOOD CREEK PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO PUBLISH AND MAIL NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS, INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO.

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. THIS EVENING WE HAVE EDGEWOOD CREEK PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN. THIS IS FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER THREE.

SO EDGEWOOD CREEK PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WAS ESTABLISHED ON MAY 12TH OF 2020.

IT'S LOCATED EAST OF FM 1385, NORTH OF FM 28 AND SOUTH OF MOBERLY DRIVE. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 247 ACRES. AND AGAIN, OUR ACTION TONIGHT IS JUST TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AND CALL FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRONG WAY. OKAY, SO IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER THREE INCLUDES 72 ACRES. IT'S 136 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. AND CONSTRUCTION IS ESTIMATED TO BE COMPLETED BY THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2026. SO IT'S ACTIVELY IN PROCESS RIGHT NOW. THE ESTIMATED AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENT COST IS ABOUT 9.3 MILLION, AND THIS ASSESSMENT IS ABOUT 3.5. KEEP IN MIND IN THIS SINGLE SERIES OF BOND ISSUANCE THAT THEY'RE UNDERTAKING, WE CURRENTLY HAVE AN IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER TWO ASSESSMENTS IN PLACE THAT'S SECURED BY A REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION. SO BY THE ISSUANCE OF THESE BONDS, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND COMPLETE THAT REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION PROCESS. AND IT WILL BE FOR EAH NUMBER TWO. AND THEN OF COURSE

[02:10:03]

FOR EAH NUMBER THREE. OKAY. SO ABOVE IS OUR ASSESSMENTS FOR A 50 FOOT LOT. IT'S APPROXIMATELY $2,942.86 FOR THE 136 LOTS. OUR TAX RATE ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED FOR CELINA ISD AND PROSPER ISD IS APPROXIMATELY $2.47, WITH THE TOTAL OVERLAPPING TAX RATE. OUR TIMELINE FOR EDGEWOOD CREEK IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER THREE IS OCTOBER. YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, ALONG WITH CALLING FOR THAT PUBLIC HEARING. AND THEN ON NOVEMBER 10TH, YOU WOULD HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING, APPROVE THE BOND PRICING. AND ALSO ON NOVEMBER 10TH, THERE WILL BE A RESOLUTION FOR AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR MUSTANG BECAUSE THE UTILITY IS LOCATED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, ARE THERE AND THEY HAVE TO ACCEPT THEM. OKAY. PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME ON EDGEWOOD CREEK PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER THREE. THANK YOU. IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION, I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM APPROVE ITEM C OF A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM C. DO I HAVE A SECOND. OKAY, I HAVE A SECOND.

EVERYBODY WILL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES FOR ITEM C. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. MOVE TO

[IX.D. Consider and act to authorize a Construction Change Order for an amount not to exceed $7,316,571.40, for the construction of the southeast wall as part of the Southeast Pump Station and Ground Storage Tank project, Bid 2025-032 to Archer Western Construction. (Janney)]

ITEM D. CONSIDER AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE A CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $7,316,571.40 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTHEAST WELL AS PART OF THE SOUTHEAST PUMP STATION AND GROUND STORAGE TANK. PROJECT BID 2025032 TO ARCHER WESTERN CONSTRUCTION.

THANK YOU. I'M EXCITED TO PRESENT THIS ONE TO YOU TONIGHT. IT IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST PUMP STATION SITE JUST OFF OF OLD GLENDENNING ROAD, BETWEEN COURT AND PRESTON. ON THE AERIAL IMAGE HERE YOU CAN SEE KIND OF THE DISTURBED GROUND WHERE THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTHEAST PUMP STATION AND STORAGE TANKS IS OCCURRING, AND ALSO IN BLUE AND THE BLUE HATCH IS THE CHANGE ORDER BEFORE YOU TONIGHT FOR THE SOUTHEAST. WELL, WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT THIS ONE BECAUSE IT'S A LITTLE BIT QUICKER WAY TO ADD ADDITIONAL SUPPLY TO THE CITY OF SALINA FOR WATER. FEBRUARY 2025 GROUNDWATER EVALUATION STUDY WAS DONE BOTH FOR THIS LOCATION AND FOR THIS LINE OF ROAD PUMP STATION WELL, WHICH IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION CURRENTLY.

IN JUNE 25TH, CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZED THE BID FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTHEAST PUMP STATION AND GROUND STORAGE TANK. AND IN AUGUST, WE REALIZED THE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND BUILD THIS WELL FOR ADDITIONAL SUPPLY FOR THE CITY OF SALINA. OVER TO THE RIGHT, YOU CAN SEE A CLIP OF THE DESIGN PLANS. THIS IS A PRETTY DEEP WELL, IT'S A LITTLE BIT DEEPER THAN THE ONE AT THIS LINE OF ROAD PUMP STATION. AND JUST UNDER A HALF A MILE DEEP.

AND THIS WELL WILL BE PRODUCING AT A MINIMUM 0.75 MGD PER DAY. SCOPE OF THE WORK. IT'S A FULL WELL CONSTRUCTION. IT'S GOING TO INCLUDE A 900 GALLON PER MINUTE PUMP. THERE ARE SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THIS IMAGE. THE DARKER IMAGE, THE DARKER SITE IMPROVEMENT IMAGES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE WELL CONSTRUCTION AND THE CHANGE ORDER. AND THE LIGHT GRAY IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOUTHEAST PUMP STATION AND STORAGE TANKS THAT IS ALREADY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. WE HAD AN OPC FROM OUR DESIGN ENGINEER OF ABOUT 7.8 MILLION. WE HAD AN INITIAL ESTIMATE FROM THE CONTRACTOR TO DO THIS WELL FOR ABOUT 8.4 MILLION. WE WERE ABLE TO STAFF WAS ABLE TO NEGOTIATE THIS AMOUNT DOWN TO 7.3, WHICH IS UNDERNEATH THE ENGINEER'S OPC, TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK. THE CHANGE ORDER ADDS 333 DAYS. SPECIFIC TO THE WELL CONSTRUCTION, IT DOES NOT ADD ANY ADDITIONAL TIME TO THE TANK OR PUMP STATION THAT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION CURRENTLY. A LARGE PART OF THAT IS BECAUSE WE ARE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SAME CONTRACTORS. WE'RE NOT INTRODUCING A NEW CONTRACTOR INTO THE SAME SPACE, WHICH OFTEN CAUSES DELAYS AND ISSUES. AND THEN WE ALSO, BECAUSE THIS IS A CHANGE ORDER INSTEAD OF A PUBLIC BID, WE DO SAVE SOME TIME UPFRONT ON CONSTRUCTION ABOUT 3 TO 5 MONTHS. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER FIVE. THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT WAS JUST ABOUT 66 MILLION. CHANGE ORDER NUMBER FIVE IS 7.3 MILLION, WITH A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED 73.4 MILLION. HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? WE'LL BE READY IN ABOUT A YEAR. YES, SIR. A LITTLE BIT UNDER A YEAR. SO WE'RE HOPING A LITTLE UNDER A LITTLE UNDER A YEAR. YEAH.

[02:15:04]

THE NEXT FALL. YEAH. UNFORTUNATELY NOT BEFORE SUMMER. WE, WE TRIED TO PUSH TO GET THAT DONE BEFORE SUMMER, BUT WE'LL BE A LITTLE AFTER THAT. SO. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM D.

APPROVE ITEM D. SECOND HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. AND I HAVE A SECOND. EVERYBODY WILL CAST YOUR VOTE TO APPROVE. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO ITEM E.

[IX.E. Consider and act to authorize Change Order No. 3 for Glendenning Parkway Improvements, Bid 2026-005, in the amount of $72,825.00 with GRod Construction, for the addition of a temporary connection from Old Log Trail to CR 53. (Janney)]

CONSIDER AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE CHANGE ORDER NUMBER THREE FOR GLENDINNING PARKWAY.

IMPROVEMENTS. BID 2026-005 IN THE AMOUNT OF $72,825 WITH G ROD CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ADDITION OF A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION FROM OLD LOG TRAIL TO COUNTY ROAD 53.

THANK YOU. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED ON GLENDINNING PARKWAY, AND TONIGHT WE HAVE A COUPLE OF OPTIONS TO GO THROUGH. OPTION ONE WOULD BE TO APPROVE THE CHANGE ORDER, AND OPTION TWO WOULD BE TO DENY THAT CHANGE ORDER AND DIRECT STAFF TO CHANGE THE PROJECT SCOPE. SO ON YOUR SCREEN HERE ON THE LEFT IS OPTION ONE, WHICH INCLUDES THE OLD LOG TRAIL FLEX SPACE SHOWN IN RED, THE TEMPORARY FLEX SPACE FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION THAT WOULD BE DONE.

FIRST, THERE'S NO CHANGES TO COUNTY ROAD 53 AND GLENDINNING WOULD BE REDONE IN ASPHALT WITH OPTION ONE. OPTION TWO HAS OLD LOG TRAIL AND COUNTY ROAD 53 IN CONCRETE BEING CONSTRUCTED FIRST. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE GLENDINNING ASPHALT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED, ALSO SHOWN IN GREEN. SO WE'LL BE KIND OF RUNNING THROUGH THOSE TWO OPTIONS AND THEN AT THE END KIND OF LAND ON A COMPARISON SLIDE TO GET SOME DIRECTIONS FROM YOU ALL. SO THE PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER IS OPTION ONE, WHICH IS THIS IS A BLOW UP OF THE FLEX BASE CONNECTIONS ABOUT 20FT WIDE. AND THIS ALSO WOULD INCLUDE NO CHANGES TO CR 53 AND THEN THE GLENDINNING.

SUBSEQUENTLY THE GLENDINNING ASPHALT REPAIR WOULD OCCUR. A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND. THE BID WAS AWARDED BY COUNCIL IN MARCH OF 2025. THE ASPHALT REPAIR CONSISTS OF FULL DEPTH SPOT REPAIRS AS WELL AS SURFACE TREATMENTS. SO IN THE TOP RIGHT YOU CAN SEE SOME ALLIGATOR CRACKING ON GLENDINNING. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF AN AREA WHERE WE DO SPOT REPAIR, AND THEN THE IMAGE BELOW THAT SHOWS IN GREEN ALL THE LOCATIONS WHERE SPOT REPAIRS ARE NECESSARY AND THE ROAD IS IN A SIMILAR CONDITION. FOLLOWING THOSE SPOT REPAIRS, WE DO A FULL SURFACE TREATMENT OF THE ROAD TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE ASPHALT. A PUBLIC MEETING WAS HELD IN AUGUST OF 2026. WE RECEIVED A FEEDBACK FROM STAKEHOLDERS AT THAT MEETING. IT WAS PRESENTED THAT WE WOULD DO ALTERNATING ONE WAY TRAFFIC OVER A FEW PHASES ON GLENDINNING. STAFF TOOK THAT FEEDBACK AND MADE SOME CHANGES, INCLUDING THE FLEX, THE FLEX BASE CONNECTION TO THE SOUTH, AS WELL AS ADJUSTING THE PHASING OF THE CONSTRUCTION FOR GLENDINNING. SO INSTEAD OF DOING ALTERNATING ONE WAY TRAFFIC, WE ADJUST THE PHASING TO ALLOW FOR WESTBOUND ONE WAY TRAFFIC THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. IF WE PROCEED WITH OPTION ONE, THE TIMELINE WOULD BE THAT WE'D HAVE A PUBLIC MEETING IN EARLY NOVEMBER AND ESTIMATED START IN LATE NOVEMBER AT THE ESTIMATED DURATION OF ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS, RESULTING IN COMPLETION OF ABOUT Q2 2027. THE COST OF OPTION ONE IS ABOUT 72,000 FOR THE CHANGE ORDER, AND ALTOGETHER ABOUT 1.3 MILLION FOR THE FULL CONSTRUCTION. SO THAT'S OPTION ONE. SO WE'RE MOVING ON TO OPTION TWO, WHICH IS TO DENY THE CHANGE ORDER AND DIRECT STAFF TO CHANGE THE PROJECT SCOPE. THIS WOULD INCLUDE SHOWN IN BLUE HERE THE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION OF OLD LOG TRAIL AND COUNTY ROAD 53, FOLLOWED BY THE ASPHALT REPAIR ON GLENDINNING. SO A LITTLE BACKGROUND HERE. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE DESIGN OF CR 53 AND OLD LOG TRAIL ON CONCRETE IN NOVEMBER OF 2020. THE PROJECT WAS REMOVED FROM THE FIVE YEAR CIP IN 2026, AND THIS IS AN IMAGE OF WHAT CR 53 LOOKS LIKE TODAY. GRAVEL FLEX BASED ROADWAY. THERE ARE SOME BENEFITS FOR DOING OLD LOG TRAIL AND CR 53 AND CONCRETE. FIRST, WE IMPROVED THE ROADWAY, IMPROVED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND A RAILROAD CROSSING. WE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CONNECTION TO GLEN CROSSING, ALLOWING RESIDENTIAL CONNECTIONS AND EMERGENCY SERVICE CONNECTION, AND WE PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY AROUND CR 53 FOR THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS AND ALSO A TURNAROUND FOR WENDELL BRANCH CREEK FLOODS. SO THE TIMELINE ON OPTION TWO, WE