[I. CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM PRESENT]
          [00:00:09]
          DIFFICULTIES. BUT I THINK WE FOUND A SOLUTION. GOOD EVENING, AND WELCOME TO SALINAS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. IT'S THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 17TH AT 5:03 P.M. WE'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND ESTABLISH A QUORUM. SEAN BAYNE, BRIAN POCHE, RYAN SAMUELSON, DANIEL TRIGO, ALAN UPCHURCH. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A QUORUM. SO NOW WE WILL SALUTE THE UNITED STATES AND TEXAS FLAG. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE. TEXAS. ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. ALRIGHT, WE WILL START WITH THE OPEN FORUM. THE OPEN FORUM IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK, PLEASE SIGN ONE OF THE SPEAKER CARDS AND PRESENT TO THE STAFF LIAISON. PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. NO ACTION CAN BE TAKEN, NO CHARGES AND OR COMPLAINTS WILL BE HEARD AGAINST ANY ELECTED OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY THAT ARE PROHIBITED BY LAW. PLEASE NOTE ANYONE WISHING TO FURNISH COPIES SLASH HANDOUTS REGARDING THEIR ITEM OF INTEREST MUST PROVIDE NINE COPIES AND PRESENT THEM TO THE STAFF LIAISON FOR DISTRIBUTION. IN THE OPEN FORUM. 
          [III. WORKSESSION]
NO. ALL RIGHT THEN, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM THREE. THAT'S OUR WORK SESSION AND WE WILL 
          [IV. CONSENT AGENDA]
ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM FOUR. THAT'S THE CONSENT CONSENT AGENDA. LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR MINUTES APPROVAL. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE AYE. ALL RIGHT. 
          [V.A. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act upon a request to rezone approximately 3 acres to a Planned Development (PD) with Commercial, Office, and Retail (C) district base zoning, and modified development standards; generally located east of KC Robinson Lane and approximately 700 feet south of Sunset Boulevard, within City Limits. (1010 KC Robinson - PD Zoning)]
MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO ITEM FIVE. THIS IS OUR PUBLIC HEARING SLASH ACTION ITEMS. WE'LL START WITH ITEM A. THAT IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES TO A PD WITH COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND RETAIL DISTRICT BASED ZONING AND MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF CASEY ROBINSON LANE AND APPROXIMATELY 700FT SOUTH OF SUNSET BOULEVARD. AND THIS IS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. THIS IS THE CASEY ROBINSON PD ZONING. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION CRAIG FISHER, PLANNING MANAGER FOR THE CITY. SO YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE JUST TO THE SOUTHEAST OF DOWNTOWN. HERE'S A ZOOMED IN LOCATION MAP SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF CASEY ROBINSON TO THE SOUTH OF SUNSET BOULEVARD. 
          THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES. IT'S IN CITY LIMITS ZONED AG. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH A BASE OF COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND RETAIL ZONING, WITH SOME MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE PROPOSED PD INCLUDES A CONCEPT PLAN AND A COLORED ELEVATION. SHOW BOTH OF THOSE TO YOU HERE IN A MOMENT. THERE'S ALSO AN OPEN STORAGE AREA TO THE REAR OF THE SITE. THE OPEN STORAGE AREA WILL BE SCREENED BY THE BUILDING. SO FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, IT'LL BE BEHIND THE BUILDING. THERE'S ALSO GOING TO BE MASONRY SCREENING WALLS ALONG THE EAST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES. AND THEN THE, THE, THE MAIN COMMERCIAL BUILDING IS PROPOSING TO HAVE BAY DOORS. THEY'LL ALSO BE TO THE REAR AND NOT VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. SO HERE'S THE CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH THE BUILDING PARKING LOT AND THE OPEN STORAGE STRUCTURE SHOWN TO THE THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE OF THE DRAWING. AND HERE'S A LOOK AT THE PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION ALONG CASEY ROBINSON. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED OFF OF A COLLECTOR JUST SOUTH OF A COMMERCIAL INTERSECTION. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE COMPLIANT WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN STANDARDS, AND THE OPEN STORAGE AREA WILL COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS LIMITED POTENTIAL TO DEVELOP WITH HIGHER LAND USES. GIVEN ITS ISOLATION. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN SUPPORTS THE REZONING REQUEST, SO YOUR RECOMMENDATION WILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR REGULAR MEETING IN OCTOBER. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST AS PRESENTED. BE HAPPY 
          [00:05:03]
TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT. ITEM A IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:21 P.M. IF THERE'S ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM A. I'M NOT. YEAH. OKAY. 
          OH THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. FIRST TIME AT ONE OF THESE. SO THANK YOU. I'M IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND I HAD A QUICK QUESTION AROUND IT. ARE ALL THREE ACRES PROPOSED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PROPERTY, OR ARE THERE OTHER PLANS TO DEVELOP THE REST? AND THEN THE SECOND QUESTION IS AROUND CASEY ROBINSON LANE, ARE THERE PLANS TO DEVELOP THE STREET GIVEN THE COMMERCIAL? THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. I CAN'T ANSWER THE STREET QUESTION, BUT THE THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THREE ACRES. AND THIS DRAWING ENTAILS THAT ENTIRE THREE ACRES. SO IT'S JUST ONE COMMERCIAL BUILDING IS PROPOSED. AND OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS HERE. SO I'LL LET THEM SPEAK TO CASEY ROBINSON TO WHETHER OR NOT WE HAVE PLANS TO IMPROVE IT. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS LINDA MAGID WITH ENGINEERING. CAN YOU HEAR ME, LINDA? LINDA. YES. SO CURRENTLY, CASEY ROBINSON IS A CLASSIFIED AS A COLLECTOR ON IN OUR THOROUGHFARE. IT'S NOT PART OF OUR FIVE YEAR CIP PLANS RIGHT NOW TO DEVELOP. IT'S MORE KIND OF THE DEVELOPER LIKE DRIVEN. SO WHEN WE HAVE DEVELOPMENT COMING IN, WE ASK THEM, YOU KNOW, TO EITHER, YOU KNOW, PUT TURN LANES SO THERE WILL BE SOME IMPROVEMENTS IN PLACE WHEN WE HAVE COMMERCIAL COMING IN. BUT AS FAR AS BUILDING THAT ROAD, IT'S NOT PART OF OUR FIVE YEAR CIP RIGHT NOW. DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? WELCOME. ANYBODY ELSE ON ITEM A? ALL RIGHT THEN I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IT IS 5:23 P.M. LOOK TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY COMMENTS OR MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON TO ITEM B. AND THAT IS CONDUCT 
          [V.B. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act upon a request for a Development Agreement on approximately 40 acres of land; generally located at the northeast comer of FM 455 and future J Fred Smith Parkway, within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). (Celina Stone Tract - Development Agreement)]
A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 41 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FM 455 AND FUTURE J. FRED SMITH PARKWAY WITHIN THE ETJ. THIS IS THE CELINA STONE TRACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE SALINA STONE TRACT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED TO THE NORTHWEST OF US OF DOWNTOWN ALONG FM 455 AND THE FUTURE FRED SMITH PARKWAY. SEE THE LOCATION HERE. THIS PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES. IT'S IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION, OUR ETJ, AND IT'S GOVERNED BY A PRE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WILL OUTLINE FUTURE ANNEXATION AND ZONING. THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING THE PROPOSED LAND USES OF A PD. 
          IS IS THE PROPOSED ZONING. IT'LL HAVE A COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BASED ZONING COMMERCIAL WILL BE AT THE HARD CORNER. THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IS STRICTLY LIGHT. INDUSTRIAL USES. 
          ANY HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE WOULD BE REQUIRE AN SUP, SO IT WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED BY RIGHT. AND THEN SELF STORAGE IS ALSO A PROPOSED USE THAT WOULD BE LIMITED TO TEN ACRES OF THE SITE. WE ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THE TOWING YARD THAT EXISTS TODAY ON COUNTY ROAD 57 THAT DOES IMPACT THIS PROPERTY. SO AGAIN, THE APPLICANTS ARE PROPOSING A BASE ZONING OF COMMERCIAL OFFICE, RETAIL AND INDUSTRIAL. IT'LL BE LIGHT. INDUSTRIAL USES TEN ACRES OF 
          [00:10:03]
COMMERCIAL GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE HARD CORNER. THEY'RE ALSO REQUESTING TO HAVE ONE GAS STATION ALLOWED BY RIGHT. AND THEN A MAXIMUM OF TEN ACRES FOR SELF STORAGE OR MINI WAREHOUSE NOT TO BE AT THE HARD CORNER. SO THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE HARD CORNER OF A FOUR LANE AND A FUTURE SIX LANE THOROUGHFARE. COMMERCIAL USES ARE APPROPRIATE HERE. I TALKED ABOUT THE TOWING YARD THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION TO ONE GAS STATION AND ONE SELF-STORAGE DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED BY RIGHT, AND THE CITY'S INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. SO AGAIN, ALL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH ZONING PROCESS AND ULTIMATELY TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. THIS AGREEMENT, IF APPROVED, WOULD BRING 40 ACRES INTO THE CITY LIMITS ALONG A PROMINENT CORRIDOR. YOUR RECOMMENDATION WILL BE TAKEN TO CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR REGULAR MEETING IN OCTOBER, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AS PRESENTED. BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT. ITEM B IS ALSO A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL OPEN THAT UP. IT'S 5:27 P.M. IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON ITEM B. NO TAKERS. SO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:27 P.M. AND OPEN UP TO THE COMMISSION FOR COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, EMOTION. I DON'T HAVE ANY. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST. 
          SECOND MOTION. UPCHURCH. SECOND. SAMUELSON. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ALRIGHT. ITEM B, MOTION CARRIES. 
          [V.C. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act upon a request for a Development Agreement on approximately 98 acres of land; generally located east of future Custer Road and approximately 1,800 feet north of future Ousley Boulevard, within both the City Limits and the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). (Cordoba Estates - Development Agreement)]
MOVING ON TO ITEM C, THAT IS, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 99 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF FUTURE CUSTER ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1800FT NORTH OF FUTURE OUSLEY BOULEVARD WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND THE ETJ. THIS IS THE CORDOVA ESTATES DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. HELLO. 
          CORDOVA ESTATES DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SHOWN HERE. WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF TOWN. THIS LOCATION MAP SHOWS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALONG JUST SOUTH OF FM 455 AT. ALONG CUSTER. CUSTER. THE NORTH SOUTH ROAD. THE PORTION THAT'S TO THE NORTH IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMITS, BUT THE MAJORITY OF THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY OUTSIDE OF CITY LIMITS. 98 ACRES IN TOTAL, 87 ACRES OF WHICH ARE IN THE ETJ 11 ACRES CURRENTLY IN CITY LIMITS. THERE IS A PRE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT IN PLACE THAT EXPIRES IN 2037, AND THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OUTLINES FUTURE ANNEXATION AND ZONING. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD CONSIST OF 661 ACRE ESTATE LOTS. THERE'S ALSO A PERIMETER ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERS WILL BE PROVIDED. THE DEVELOPMENT WILL ALSO CORRECT THAT SEVERE JOG THAT EXISTS IN THE COUNTY ROAD TODAY. THE ESTATE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TYPICALLY HAS A STREET CROSS SECTION OF CONCRETE STREETS WITH DITCH DRAINAGE AND NO SIDEWALKS. THIS CONCEPT PLAN SHOWS HOW THE PROPERTY MAY DEVELOP WITH THE LARGE ESTATE LOTS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE DRAWING. THE NEW PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE THAT CORRECTING THAT JOG IN THE COUNTY ROAD. THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL BRING AN ADDITIONAL 87 ACRES INTO THE CITY LIMITS. WITH CITY STANDARDS. A PIT IS NOT PROPOSED. IT'LL BE LARGE HOMES ON LARGE LOTS, WHICH IS COMPLIANT WITH THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. AGAIN, CORRECTING THAT DANGEROUS JOG IN CUSTER WILL MAKE TRAVEL SAFER. CURRENTLY, THERE ARE NO LAND USE RESTRICTIONS IN THE ETJ AND THE COUNTY, SO THERE'S LIMITED JURISDICTION TODAY. YOUR RECOMMENDATION WILL BE TAKEN TO CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR MEETING IN OCTOBER. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM AS PRESENTED. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE. THANK YOU. I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. 
          ALL RIGHT. APPRECIATE IT. ONCE AGAIN, ITEM C IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO WE'LL OPEN THAT UP AT 5:30 P.M. IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM C. AGAIN, NO TAKERS. SO I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 530 IN THE P M AND OPEN IT TO THE COMMISSION. QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. MOTIONS. 
          [00:15:07]
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. SECOND. MOTION SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. 
          [V.D. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act upon a request to amend the City's Code of Ordinances, by amending Chapter 14: Zoning, Article 14.02: Zoning Districts, Part Four: Non-Residential Zoning Districts, Article 14.03: Use Regulations, Part One: Schedule of Uses, and related sections of the Zoning Ordinance, to amend agricultural regulations. (SB 785 Mobile Homes - Text Amendment)]
MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO ITEM D. AND THAT IS, CONDUCT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING CHAPTER 14 ZONING. 
          ARTICLE 14.02 ZONING DISTRICTS PART FOUR NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. ARTICLE 14.03 USE REGULAR USE REGULATIONS. PART ONE SCHEDULE OF USES AND RELATED SECTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO AMEND AGRICULTURE REGULATIONS. THIS IS A STATE BILL. 785 MOBILE HOMES TEXT AMENDMENT. GOOD EVENING. THIS EVENING WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A PROPOSED ORDINANCE CHANGE IN. 
          IN RESPONSE TO SB 785, WHICH ONE? EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1ST OF THIS YEAR, IT REQUIRES CITIES TO ALLOW FOR ESSENTIALLY A MOBILE HOME. THERE'S A STATE DEFINITION, FEDERAL DEFINITION FOR MOBILE HOME, BUT I'M GOING TO COMMONLY REFER TO IT AS A MOBILE HOME FOR USE AS A DWELLING BY RIGHT WITHIN EITHER BASICALLY WITHIN A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT THAT IN THE TEXT, AND THEN ALSO HAVE THAT ZONING DISTRICT ZONED TO THE GROUND SOMEPLACE AVAILABLE WITHIN THE CITY. THIS IS THE STATE'S EFFORT IN ORDER TO INCREASE AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUPPLY IN THE STATE. AND THE CITY MUST ENSURE THAT THE THE ABOVE HAS BEEN ADOPTED AND APPLIES TO AN AREA WITHIN THE ZONING. THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CITY LIMITS. OUR TIMELINE HERE IS TO GO TO PNC IN SEPTEMBER. IN OCTOBER FOR CITY COUNCIL. SO WE CURRENTLY HAVE A MOBILE HOME DISTRICT WITHIN SOLANA, BUT IT'S NOWHERE ON THE GROUND. SO IT'S JUST IN THE TEXT AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, BUT IT'S NOT ZONED TO THE GROUND. THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT ALLOWS FOR ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, WHICH COULD INCLUDE A BASICALLY A MOBILE HOME. THE CITY ATTORNEY ADVISED THAT THE AG DISTRICT, WHICH EXISTS BOTH IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND IS ZONED TO THE GROUND IN VARIOUS PLACES AROUND THE CITY, SATISFIES THE PROVISION OF SB 785. HOWEVER, THE CITY ATTORNEY ALSO ADVISED THAT THE USE CHART SHOULD BE REVISED TO BETTER CLARIFY THE EXISTING ALLOWANCES WITHIN THE TEXT OF THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. SO THIS IS THE USE CHART REVISIONS THAT WILL GET THE CITY INTO EVEN ABUNDANT COMPLIANCE WITH SB 785. 
          AS YOU CAN SEE, IT CLARIFIES THAT YES, RESIDENTIAL IS TECHNICALLY ALLOWED IN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TEXT INDICATES THAT. BUT THE USE CHART NEVER STATED THAT. BUT IF YOU HAVE AN 80 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, YES, YOU CAN PLACE A HOUSE ON IT. ONE. IF YOU HAVE A 200 ACRE TRACT, YOU CAN PUT A HOME ON IT. ONE SO THAT'S, THAT'S HOW THAT WORKS. SO AGAIN, THE THE SENATE BILL WENT LIVE SEPTEMBER 1ST. AG ALREADY ALLOWS FOR ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT, WHICH INCLUDES A MOBILE HOME. THE PROPOSED USE CHART REVISION REFLECTS THE ENTITLEMENT THAT EXISTS IN THE TEXT TODAY AND IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW. AS BEST PRACTICE FOR LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS TO BE CHARACTERIZED ILLUSTRATED IN THE USE CHART AND NOT SIMPLY IN THE TEXT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BECAUSE THEN SOMETIMES IT GETS LOST TO MEMORY. AND THE ONLY OTHER OPTION WE HAVE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WOULD BE TO SPOT ZONE SOMETHING TO MOBILE HOME DISTRICT, WHICH IS STAFF DOES NOT RECOMMEND. SO AGAIN, AFTER THIS EVENING, WE'LL BE GOING TO CITY COUNCIL IN OCTOBER TO SEEK THEIR APPROVAL. STAFF'S AVAILABLE FOR ANY ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION. THANK YOU AGAIN. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ON THAT ONE. NO. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. DUSTY. ALL RIGHT. ITEM D IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL OPEN THAT UP AT 5:34 P.M. ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM D? NOPE. THEN WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:35 P.M. LOOK FOR ANY COMMENTS OR EMOTION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. 
          MOTION SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE AYE. ALRIGHT. MOTION CARRIES AND THAT WILL ADJOURN OUR MEETING THIS
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.