Sep 08, 2026 City Council

[I. CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM PRESENT]

[00:00:02]

GO AHEAD AND ADJOURN THE TOURS NUMBER 11 MEETING. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE DIRECTLY INTO THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. IT IS. 441. I WILL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. WE DO HAVE A

[II. EXECUTIVE SESSION]

[IV.A. Tiny Miss Celina Recognition. (Tubbs) ]

[V.A. Discussion regarding a legislative agenda for the 2027 Texas Legislative Session. (Kearney) ]

[V.B. Appointment of Ad-Hoc committee for Downtown Square Redevelopment. (Brawner) ]

[V.C. Discussion regarding the development of Ousley Park. (Walsh) ]

[00:59:08]

[00:59:16]

[00:59:23]

[00:59:29]

[00:59:35]

[00:59:41]

[00:59:46]

[00:59:52]

[00:59:56]

[01:00:03]

[01:00:08]

[01:00:15]

[V.D. Discussion on design amendment to Wilson Creek Park. (Walsh) ]

WILSON CREEK PARK, LOCATED ON THE EASTERN SECTION OF OUR COMMUNITY. TONIGHT, WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND AND BRIEF UPDATES. WE'LL REVIEW THE WELL PERMIT PROCESS. WE'LL TALK ABOUT ADDITIONAL WATER CONSERVATION INITIATIVES THAT WE HAVE CHALLENGED OUR DESIGN TEAM. AND THEN WE'LL END WITH PRESENT DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL DESIGN AMENDMENTS. WILSON CREEK PARK IS A 100 ACRE COMMUNITY PARK. MASTER PLAN WAS APPROVED IN 2020 FOR THE MAJOR ELEMENTS OF THE PARK. TWO NATURAL GRASS MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS. I SAY MULTI-PURPOSE. THEY CAN BE UTILIZED FOR RECTANGLE SPORTS OR OTHERS. A FUTURE PHASE WILL INCLUDE FOUR SYNTHETIC SURFACE DIAMOND GAME FIELDS THAT WOULD BE SIMILAR TO WHAT WE HAVE AT OLD SALINA PARK COURT, SPORTS PLAYGROUNDS, AMPHITHEATER AND EVENT LAWN PARK WILL ALSO INCLUDE TRAILS AND DISC GOLF, AMENITY PONDS AND OF COURSE, PARKING AND RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE. PHASE ONE OF WILSON CREEK PARK IS APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES. CONSTRUCTION BEGAN A YEAR AGO, AND THE MAJOR ELEMENTS FOR PHASE ONE ARE THE TWO NATURAL GRASS GAME FIELD AREAS, TRAILS, RESTROOM FACILITY PARKING, AND RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE. AS WE BEGAN THIS PROCESS, ONCE THE DESIGN WAS FINALIZED, WE WENT TO THE NORTH TEXAS GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND WITH THE HELP OF OUR CONSULTING TEAM, WE SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION FOR 48 MILLION ANNUAL GALLONS BASED ON THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. AS THE PROCESS GOES, WE PROVIDE THEIR STAFF AND THEIR BOARD WITH OUR PLANS. THEY REVIEW OUR PARK DESIGN AND IRRIGATION PLANS, AND THEIR STAFF MODIFIED OUR REQUEST TO 32 MILLION ANNUAL GALLONS. AND AS WE MET WITH THE ACTUAL NORTH TEXAS GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD, THEY ISSUED A PERMIT OF 9.1 MILLION GALLONS. HOW THAT PERMIT ALLOTMENT LOOKS IN PRACTICE IS THAT REPRESENTS ONE WEEKLY IRRIGATION CYCLE AT ABOUT A HALF INCH FOR 35 WEEKS ON JUST ONE OF THE GAME FIELD AREAS. WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO INCLUDE IRRIGATION BUBBLERS FOR OUR TREES. AND ONE THING TO NOTE WITH THAT IS ONCE THE TREES GET ESTABLISHED 4 TO 5 YEARS, THOSE TREE BUBBLERS CAN BE TURNED OFF AND THERE IS LIMITED IRRIGATION THROUGHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THE PARK. WE WENT THROUGH WITH OUR CONSULTING TEAM AND LOOKED AT WHAT DIFFERENT WATER DISTRIBUTION PLANS TO SHOW YOU HOW THE 9.1 MILLION WILL BE UTILIZED. IF WE WERE TO WATER THE ENTIRE AREA OF USABLE PARK SPACE. THAT ANALYSIS WAS 32 MILLION GALLONS A YEAR. IF WE LOOKED AT PROVIDING AN INCH OF WATER ON THE TWO GAME FIELD AREAS, WE'RE AT ABOUT 19 MILLION. AND AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE PERMIT THAT WE RECEIVED IS 9.1 MILLION. WE THEN CHALLENGED DUNAWAY, WHO IS OUR DESIGN TEAM. WE DID A DESIGN AMENDMENT TO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES. RECENTLY, THE COUNCIL APPROVED THE MEDIA AND DESIGN GUIDEBOOK, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT IS A MEDIUM AND NOT A PARK, BUT WE TOOK ELEMENTS FROM THAT GUIDEBOOK. WE STARTED THE INTRODUCTION OF AGGREGATES WITHIN THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS AND LOOKED AT THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN TO HOW WE HOW WE CAN INCLUDE ADDITIONAL NATIVE PLANTINGS, DROUGHT TOLERANT AND NATIVE SEED MIXES WE'RE LOOKING AT IN DIFFERENT AREAS. AND AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, TREE BUBBLERS WILL REMAIN WITHIN THE DESIGN OF THE PARK. IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT EXPECTATIONS TO GET, WHETHER IT'S THE TURF OR NATIVE LANDSCAPING, TO TAKE ROOT THAT REQUIRES CONSISTENT AND FREQUENT IRRIGATION AT THE BEGINNING. AND IF WE DO NATIVE SEED MIXES, SOMETIMES THOSE TAKE MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF WATER AND AMOUNT OF RAIN WE GET FROM MOTHER NATURE. WE CONTINUE TO ANALYZE THE 9.1 MILLION GALLONS, WHICH THEN TOOK OUR DISCUSSION TO THE UTILIZATION OF SYNTHETIC

[01:05:01]

THE TIME FRAME IS 5 TO 6 MONTHS FOR THE DESIGN AND THE CONSTRUCTION. THE POSITIVE ASPECT OF THIS IS THAT OUR CURRENT AND FUTURE GAME FIELDS WILL ALL BE SYNTHETIC TURF. SO FROM A CONSISTENCY OF MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND OPERATIONS AND RAINOUTS, THE EQUIPMENT THAT WE WOULD NEED TO PURCHASE, THERE WOULD BE CONSISTENCY AMONGST ALL THE DIFFERENT GAME FIELDS THAT WE HAVE. OPTION B WOULD BE THE INSTALLATION OF SYNTHETIC TURF ON ONE OF THE GAME FIELD AREAS. COST WOULD BE ROUGHLY HALF AT $4 MILLION. THAT'S A ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST. AGAIN, THAT WOULD BE A 5 TO 6 MONTH PROCESS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. WE WOULD PURCHASE ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT. WE WOULD NEED EQUIPMENT TO MAINTAIN OUR GRASS, AS WELL AS GROOMERS TO MAINTAIN THE SYNTHETIC TURF. AND AS PHASE TWO WERE TO COME ONLINE, WE PLAN TO HAVE FOUR SYNTHETIC FIELDS AND FROM AN OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT FROM RAINOUTS AND RESCHEDULING THAT WOULD STAFF WOULD HAVE TO MANAGE BOTH NATURAL GRASS GRASS REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS SYNTHETIC TURF. SO RECAP. I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. OPTION A IS INSTALLATION OF SYNTHETIC TURF ON BOTH GAME FIELD AREAS. APPROXIMATELY $8 MILLION FOR INSTALLATION OF SYNTHETIC TURF ON ONE OF THE GAME FIELD AREAS. APPROXIMATELY $4 MILLION. BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. I'M TRYING TO THINK ABOUT THIS FROM A TIMING STANDPOINT. WOULD YOU SAY THAT WE NEED BOTH FIELDS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BASED OFF OF, OBVIOUSLY, OUR POPULATION GROWTH, BUT THE DEMAND THAT WE HAVE AT OLD SALINA PARK TODAY? YES, OUR OUR TIME SLOT AVAILABILITY, THE INCREASE OF OUR LEAGUES AND REGISTRATION. OUR SOCCER LEAGUE IS GROWING TREMENDOUSLY, AS IS ALL OF OUR SPORTS. THE THE AMOUNT OF TIME SLOTS THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE AT OLD SALINA PARK IS REDUCING. SO YES, THE ADDITION OF WILSON CREEK PARK IS. WE WILL USE IT RIGHT AWAY. RIGHT AWAY. AND THEN. DO YOU SEE THESE. I THINK ALMOST EVERY TURF FIELD I SEE, IT'S FENCED. SO DO YOU SEE THIS AS BEING. I'M JUST THINKING ABOUT ONE BEING. IF THEY'RE BOTH SYNTHETIC TURF, ARE WE GOING TO HAVE TO FENCE IT ALSO TO WORRY ABOUT VANDALISM OR DOES IT. I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK ABOUT HOW HOW IT OPENS UP. IF WE GO ONE NOW, POTENTIALLY GO ONE LATER VERSUS DOING IT ALL UP FRONT. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE'LL LOOK AT. THE CURRENT DESIGN DOES HAVE FENCING AROUND THE FIELDS ON THE NORTHERN FIELD, NOT THE ENTIRE PERIMETER, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE WILL LOOK AT. AND IN ADDITION, WE HAVE STAFF THAT ARE OUT AT OUR PARKS THAT MONITOR AND LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT USAGE THAT TAKES PLACE, AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO PERFORM THAT REGARDLESS OF THE TYPE OF SURFACE THAT IS OUT THERE. AND WHAT'S WHAT'S THE LIFE EXPECTANCY? THE TECHNOLOGY ON TURF IS IMPROVING WITH PROPER MAINTENANCE. YOU'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT A TEN YEAR LIFE CYCLE, BUT, YOU KNOW, TEN, 12 YEARS.

AND THEN YOU GOT TO REPLACE IT OR JUST REPAIR IT AFTER 10 OR 12 YEARS, TYPICALLY TYPICALLY REPLACE IN THE 10 TO 12 YEAR MARK, BUT A LOT OF YOUR SUBSTRATE IS ALREADY THERE. SO THE REPLACEMENT COST IS 50 TO 66% OF THE COST. WE HAVE A LOT OF THE FOUNDATION ALREADY IN PLACE. DO WE SAVE ON STAFF BY GOING WITH ONE OVER THE OTHER? I MEAN FROM A OR IS THE MAINTENANCE STILL THE SAME? I KNOW WE ARE CONVERTING A LOT OF OUR OLDER FIELDS FOR THAT, FOR AVAILABILITY AND FOR MAINTENANCE. WHAT CAN YOU KIND OF TALK TO THAT? AND THE IN THE GROWING SEASON, OUR STAFF WILL MOW OUR GAME FIELDS 2 TO 3 TIMES A WEEK TO KEEP THAT AT A SHORT LEVEL. THAT GOES BACK TO 1 TO 2 DAYS A WEEK AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF YEAR. IT'S WITHIN SYNTHETIC TURF. WE WILL NOT BE PERFORMING THAT. SO WE'LL SAVE ON THE COST OF STAFFING. THERE IS MAINTENANCE THAT IS REQUIRED. THERE ARE, YOU KNOW, EQUIPMENT THAT WE WOULD NEED TO PURCHASE.

BUT YES, THE DAY TO DAY MAINTENANCE FROM A GENERAL FUND STANDPOINT WOULD BE REDUCED. IN ADDITION TO NOT HAVING THE IRRIGATION USAGE AND THE IRRIGATION REPAIRS THAT TAKE PLACE. WHAT'S THE BIG DIFFERENCE IN THE ALLOTTED WATER THERE FOR OPTION A OVER OPTION B, AND HOW THAT CAN FACILITATE THE REST OF THE PARK? IF WE WERE TO. IF WE WERE TO LOOK AT THE THE FIELD AND GREEN BEING SYNTHETIC TURF, WE WOULD NEED TO WATER THE SOUTHERN FIELD AND THE 9 MILLION GALLONS. WE HAVE EVAPORATION. IT. WE WILL BE ABLE TO WATER THAT 35 WEEKS A YEAR, HALF AN INCH. THAT WOULD BE A CHALLENGE IN A YEAR LIKE WE'VE HAD THIS YEAR WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SUPPLEMENTAL RAIN FROM MOTHER NATURE, THAT WOULD BE A

[01:10:02]

[V.E. Discussion on 2026 Water Conservation. (Brawner, Figueroa) ]

THAT'S OUR CONVERSATION CONSISTENTLY. OKAY. WE WANTED TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE FROM LAST MONTH OF WHERE WE'RE AT ON THE WATER CONSERVATION. REMIND EVERYBODY OUR GOAL WITH CONSERVATION IS TO CONSERVE, NOT RESTRICT. THEY KIND OF GO HAND IN HAND, BUT IT'S A CONSERVATION MORE THAN ANYTHING, JUST A KEY STATISTICS. WE SAW THIS LAST MONTH, BUT WE HAVE ISSUED MANY, MANY MORE WATER WARNINGS THAN WE WATER WARNINGS THAN WE DID LAST MONTH. YOU CAN SEE THE NUMBER OF METERS CONTINUES TO INCREASE OUR MAXIMUM USAGE. WE DID HIT OUR MAX LAST MONTH AT 12.3 MILLION GALLONS IN A SINGLE DAY. OUR SUBSCRIPTION TO UPPER TRINITY HAS INCREASED FROM 10.5 TO 11 MILLION GALLONS, BUT WE WERE STILL OVER OUR SUBSCRIPTION.

AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND WAS 7.1. WE HAD 20 DAYS ABOVE OUR SUBSCRIPTION LIMIT, INCLUDING OUR NEW SUBSCRIPTION, AND YOU CAN SEE THE NUMBER OF WATER WARNINGS THAT'S BEEN ISSUED.

REPEAT VIOLATIONS ARE 998, AND MOST SIGNIFICANTLY, WE ISSUED 21 CITATIONS. TECHNICALLY, WE ANSWERED 19 CITATIONS AS OF LAST FRIDAY. WE HAVE ANOTHER 13 THAT ARE POTENTIALLY GOING TO BE ISSUED THIS WEEK FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE ISSUED THEIR THIRD VIOLATION. HERE'S A MAP. HERE'S THE TABLE YOU GUYS SAW LAST MONTH REGARDING OUR SUBSCRIPTION. YOU CAN SEE WHERE OUR BUMP HAPPENED AUGUST 25TH. WE WENT UP. SINCE THEN WE HAVE STAYED RELATIVELY BELOW OUR SUBSCRIPTION, BUT WE ARE STILL WITHIN THE MARGIN FOR STAGE TWO AND STAGE THREE RESTRICTIONS.

SO STEPS TOWARD COMPLIANCE. JUST AS A REMINDER. FIRST WARNING, YOU GET A YELLOW DOOR HANGER AND A FLAG IN THE YARD. YOU'RE GETTING A JUST A GENERIC EMAIL FROM UTILITY BILLING SAYING, JUST A REMINDER, WE'RE ON STAGE RESTRICTIONS AND WE GIVE YOU A TWO WEEK GRACE PERIOD FOR COMPLIANCE. THE PUBLIC WORKS TEAMS ARE THE ONES THAT GO OUT IN THE FIELD, AND THEY HANG THE DOOR HANGERS AND PUT THE FLAGS. THE SECOND WARNING IS A SIMILAR SITUATION, EXCEPT THE FLAG IS NOW OR THE DOOR HANGER IS NOW ORANGE. AGAIN, YOU GET AN EMAIL FROM

[01:15:04]

[VI. OPEN FORUM]

GOOD JOB. ALL RIGHT. THIS IS OPEN FORUM. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? AV

[01:20:09]

I ACTUALLY JUST WANTED TO ADDRESS THIS YOUNG LADY REPRESENTING HSSI HAD NO IDEA ANY PRESENTATION WAS GOING TO BE DONE AROUND THAT. MY WIFE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVITED TO ONE OF THEIR CELEBRATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH TEACHERS AS A GURU. CELEBRATION WAS ONE OF THE MOST. IT WAS ONE OF THE MOST WONDERFUL EXPERIENCES MY WIFE AND I HAVE BEEN TO IN A LONG TIME. VERY OPEN COMMUNITY AND ANYWAY, I JUST REALLY APPRECIATE IT. IT WAS IT WAS A GREAT, GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN ABOUT A DIFFERENT CULTURE. SO THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO SHARE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SHERRY. YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES AS WELL. SHERRY STANWIX, 305 TOBACCO COURT WATER. WE'VE GOTTEN A NOTICE BECAUSE WE WERE A LITTLE BIT HIGHER THAN NORMAL, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT REALLY WAS FAIR. AND I CALLED AND TALKED TO HIM. AT LEAST THAT IS GOOD. HOPEFULLY WE DON'T GET ANOTHER NOTICE FOR A HOSE BIB ACCIDENTALLY GETTING LEFT ON BY A KID. SO I MEAN, THERE'S, THERE'S EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT HAPPEN. AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT REALLY REFLECTS THE FACT THAT WE HAVE IT'S BUILT ON AN AVERAGE OF A FAMILY OF FOUR. WE HAVE NINE IN OUR HOUSE, AND WE DON'T HAVE A 200 ZERO SQUARE FOOT HOME EITHER. THANK THE LORD. SO WE HAVE A LARGER HOME, AND WE ALSO HAVE FOUR HOSE BIBS. AND WE DON'T HAVE A SPRINKLER SYSTEM THAT WORKS AT THIS POINT. IT'S ALL HAND WATERING, BUT IT'S HARD TO TO STAY OR TO REALIZE WHAT WHAT YOU'RE DOING AND, AND ACCIDENTS HAPPEN. SO THERE WAS ONE DAY THAT NORMALLY I GUESS OUR USAGE IS 500 TO 1000 AND IT WAS UP TO 1500. SO WE GOT A CITATION FOR THAT. WELL, I'M NOT SURE THAT THAT WAS REALLY FAIR. AND WE'LL SEE WHAT THIS NEXT WEEK OR TWO HAS TO OFFER FOR US. BUT THINGS HAPPEN. THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK. OKAY. IF THERE'S NOBODY ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK, I'LL CLOSE. OPEN FORUM AT 818. WE'RE GOING TO

[VII. CONSENT AGENDA]

[VIII.A. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider and act upon an Ordinance on the voluntary annexation of approximately six (6) acres, generally located approximately 800 feet north of the Outer Loop and west of Coit Road, within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), for 1901 S. Coit Road. (McAfee) ]

[01:25:01]

PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. AND IN TERMS OF THE ZONING DISTRICT, THE OUTER LOOP OVERLAY, IT ALLOWS FOR A MIX OF RETAIL, OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL, BUT IT DOES NOT ALLOW FOR ANY MULTIFAMILY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL APPROVALS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. SO THIS IS ONLY FOR COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND RETAIL. THE ZONING NO MULTIFAMILY OR OTHER RESIDENTIAL WOULD BE ALLOWED ON THIS PROPERTY IF ANNEXED AND ZONED INTO THE CITY LIMITS. IMPORTANT TO NOTE FOR PROPERTIES IN THE ETJ ARE UNDER NO LAND USE RESTRICTIONS. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL IN AUGUST. THERE'S NO PUBLIC FEEDBACK AT THE PUBLIC MEETING, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS PRESENTED. THIS IS TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS, ONE FIRST FOR THE ANNEXATION. THE SECOND ONE WOULD BE FOR THE ZONING. BUT ONE PRESENTATION. DUSTY, ARE WE. WHEN SOME WHEN THIS PROPERTY IS COMING IN, ARE WE ASKING THEM TO RESTRICT OUT MULTIFAMILY USES AND AND GO MORE ALONG THE LINES OF WHAT THE OUTER LOOP COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP OVERLAY GUIDES THE CURRENT STATE LAW. WE AMENDED OUR USE CHART EARLIER LAST YEAR TO ALLOW FOR. WITH AN SUPA HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. IN OUR NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, THAT MAKES. SO WE. THEY'RE NOT ENTITLED TO MULTIFAMILY ONCE WE CROSS 150. UNLESS STATE LAW CHANGES. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. I'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IT IS 822. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM A? GO AHEAD, SIR.

GOOD EVENING. DAVID BOND WITH SPIRES ENGINEERING, 765 CUSTER ROAD IN PLANO. HERE. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT TONIGHT, RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM AND THE NEXT ONE, I SUPPOSE. HAPPY TO HAVE GOTTEN TO THIS POINT WITH DUSTY AND STAFF AND AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MIGHT HAVE. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM A? OKAY. IF NO ONE WISH TO SPEAK, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM A. MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM A SECOND, HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE. EVERYBODY WILL CAST YOUR VOTES.

[VIII.B. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider and act upon an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by zoning approximately six (6) acres to Collin County Outer Loop Overlay District (CCOLO), generally located approximately 800 feet north of the Outer Loop and west of Coit Road, for 1901 S. Coit Road. (McAfee) ]

IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM B? YOU'LL BE ALL RIGHT. OKAY. IF NO ONE WANTS TO SPEAK, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM B, MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM B. OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE. IF EVERYBODY WILL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY, THAT MOTION CARRIES 6 TO 0. WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM C, CONDUCT A PUBLIC

[VIII.C. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider and act upon an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by rezoning approximately four (4) acres to Commercial, Office, & Retail District (C) zoning, with the Preston Road Overlay (PRO); generally located east of Preston Road and approximately 800 feet south of Sunset Boulevard, within City limits, for S Preston Retail. (McAfee) ]

THIS EVENING, WE'RE CONDUCTING ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING FOR A PROPOSED REZONING OF THE PROPERTY. AS SHOWN ON THE SCREEN. THE PROPERTY IS FOUR ACRES IN SIZE. IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED AGRICULTURE DISTRICT AND IT WAS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS IN 2015. THE APPLICANT

[01:30:02]

[VIII.D. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider testimony and act upon an Ordinance accepting and approving a Service and Assessment Plan and Assessment Rolls for Improvement Area #1, Improvement Area #2 and Improvement Area #3 of the Ariana Public Improvement District; making a finding of special benefit to the property in Improvement Areas #1-3 of the District; levying special assessments against such property and establishing a lien on such property; providing for the method of assessment and the payment of the assessments in accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended; and providing penalties and interest on delinquent assessments. (Bromiley) ]

THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS OVER. ARIANA PIT TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS THROUGH IMPROVEMENT AREAS ONE THROUGH THREE. THE ARIANA PIT WAS ESTABLISHED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2024, AND THE PIT IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PRIVATE ROAD 5524 AND WEST OF NORTH LOUISIANA DRIVE. IT IS APPROXIMATELY 120 ACRES. IT WILL CONSIST OF 259 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 36 CUSTOM ESTATE LOTS AND 75 TOWNHOMES. THE ESTIMATED AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENT COST FOR ALL THREE AREAS COMBINED IS APPROXIMATELY 19.6 MILLION, WITH THE ESTIMATED PIT ASSESSMENT OF 19,112,000. THE THREE DIFFERENT ALLOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ABOVE FOR ONE, TWO AND THREE. THE ASSESSMENTS, WHEN LEVIED, WILL SECURE A SINGLE SERIES OF PIT BONDS TO BE ISSUED FOLLOWING THE LEVY IMPROVEMENT ERA NUMBER ONE HAVE LOT SIZES RANGING FROM 60 FOOT TO 40 FOOT LOTS, WITH THE TOTAL AVERAGE ANNUAL INSTALLMENT PER UNIT RANGING FROM 3360 $61 TO $5522. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL OVERLAPPING TAX RATE FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER ONE IS APPROXIMATELY $2.81. HOUR IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER TWO THE ESTATE LOTS HAVE LOT SIZES, RANGING FROM A THIRD ACRE UP TO THREE QUARTERS OF AN ACRE, WITH ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS PER UNIT RANGING FROM $8123 TO $10,153. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL OVERLAPPING TAX RATE ACROSS ALL THREE ESTATE LOT SIZES IS $2.69, APPROXIMATELY. IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER THREE CONSISTS OF TOWNHOMES WITH THE INSTALLMENT

[01:35:01]

ALL RIGHT. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM D AT 830. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM D? OKAY, NO ONE WISH TO SPEAK. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND LOOK FOR A MOTION MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM D. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION FROM ANDY, A SECOND FROM BRANDON. IF EVERYBODY WILL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES 6 TO 0. WE'LL MOVE TO

[VIII.E. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider testimony and act upon an Ordinance accepting and approving a Service and Assessment Plan and Assessment Rolls for Improvement Area #1, Improvement Area #2 and Improvement Area #3 of the Ariana Public Improvement District; making a finding of special benefit to the property in Improvement Areas #1-3 of the District; levying special assessments against such property and establishing a lien on such property; providing for the method of assessment and the payment of the assessments in accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended; and providing penalties and interest on delinquent assessments. (Bromiley) ]

THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS FOR THE PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 27 BUDGET AND THE PROPOSED TAX RATE. THIS PRESENTATION WILL COVER THIS PUBLIC HEARING IN THE ONE RIGHT AFTER FOR THE TAX. THE CITY MUST FOLLOW TRUTH AND TAXATION. REGULATION. COMPLIANCE THAT IS WITH TEXAS TAX CODE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, AND THIS IS TO ENSURE TRANSPARENCY AND BUDGET ADOPTION AND TAX RATE SETTINGS.

THE CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSED BUDGET WAS WORKSHOPPED WITH COUNCIL ON AUGUST THE 3RD AND ALSO AUGUST THE 11TH. THE NO NEW REVENUE, VOTER RATES AND THE VOTER APPROVAL RATES WERE FINALIZED IN LATE JULY BASED ON CERTIFIED VALUES FROM COLLIN AND DENTON COUNTY. HERE WE HAVE OUR PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATE. THE RATE IS PROPOSED TO BE 0.571677. THAT RATE, A RATE IS MADE UP OF TWO COMPONENTS THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF 0.263260 AND THE INTEREST AND SINKING OTHERWISE KNOWN AS DEBT SERVICE OF 0.308417, FOR A TOTAL COMBINED RATE OF 0.571677.

IMPORTANTLY, IT IS GOOD TO NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED RATE IS EQUAL TO BOTH THE VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE AND THE NO NEW REVENUE TAX RATE. OUR ANNUAL BUDGET FOCUS AREAS THIS YEAR ARE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY, PUBLIC SAFETY, INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE, DEVELOPMENT RELATED OPERATIONS, SERVICE EXPANSION AND EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS. LOOKING AT THE CITY'S OVERALL BUDGET ACROSS ALL FUNDS, THE EXPENDITURES ARE ESTIMATED AT 5 MILLION 205,000,209 000.1. HERE ARE IS THE BREAKDOWN ACROSS THE DIFFERENT COMPONENT UNITS. MOVING ON TO THE GENERAL FUND, WE ARE. WE ARE. SORRY. WE ARE PROJECTING APPROXIMATELY $69.3 MILLION IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE. MOST OF THAT IS MADE UP OF PROPERTY TAX AT 41%, DEVELOPMENT FEES AT 31%, AND OUR SALES TAX AT 10%, WHICH KEEPS ON CLIMBING EVERY YEAR. THE REST ARE OTHER FEES AND FINES AND OTHER REVENUE SOURCES. OUR GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES ARE COMING IN AT ABOUT 69 POINT.

MILLION. PUBLIC SAFETY IS OUR LARGEST GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE AT 48%, GENERAL

[01:40:02]

HERE WE HAVE A PIE CHART OF THE EXPENSES BY CATEGORY. AS YOU CAN SEE, OUR PERSONNEL EXPENSE MAKES UP THE ENTIRETY OF LARGE PORTION OF THE PIE AT 70.2%, WHICH COLLIDES WITH OUR EMPLOYEES, ARE WHAT IS BRINGING THE SERVICE ACROSS THE CITY. PROPRIETARY FUNDS. THE PROPOSED WATER WASTEWATER BUDGET INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 6.3 MILLION IN REVENUE. WATER SALES REPRESENT 45%, WASTEWATER SALES, 34% WATER AND WASTEWATER CONNECTION FEES AT APPROXIMATELY 13%. FOR A TOTAL INCREASE IN REVENUE OF 5.3 MILLION OVER PRIOR YEAR'S BUDGET. ON THE EXPENDITURE SIDE, TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR THE WATER WASTEWATER IS 58.5 MILLION. THE CHART REPRESENTS 34%. IS WATER EXPENSES, WASTEWATER IS 16% AND DEBT IS.

SERVICE, WHICH IS CITY ISSUED, IS APPROXIMATELY 34%. THIS IS A LISTING OF ALL THE POSITIONS THAT WE ADDED THIS YEAR FOR PROPOSED. THE GENERAL FUND POSITION. FTE IS 339 PROPOSED WITH THE UTILITY FUNDS COMING AT TEN POSITIONS PROPOSED AND EQUATING TO 49 ADDITIONAL POSITIONS IN THE FISCAL YEAR 27 BUDGET. A LISTING OF OTHER FUNDS IS SEEN HERE. THESE ARE FUNDS THAT ARE NORMALLY RESTRICTED REVENUE AND OR EXPENSES. THE ESTIMATED REVENUE EXPENDITURES ARE LISTED WITH THE ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCES. OUR PROCESS TO ADOPTION. WE HAD A SPECIAL MEETING ON AUGUST 3RD TO DO A BUDGET WORKSHOP. ON AUGUST 11TH.

WE HAD ANOTHER BUDGET WORKSHOP, AND WE HAD ORDINANCES TO CALL FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. WE PUBLISHED A BUDGET AND TAX RATE NOTICES IN THE SALINA RECORD ON AUGUST THE 21ST. AND TONIGHT WE ARE HOLDING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON BOTH THE BUDGET AND TAX RATE AND LATER ON TO CONSIDER SETTING THE TAX AND BUDGET. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS? NOPE. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND AGAIN, THIS PUBLIC THIS PRESENTATION IS FOR THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING ALSO. OKAY, JULIE, NONE OF THESE ARE ROLL CALL, RIGHT? YES. ARE THEY ROLL CALL? OKAY. JUST MAKING SURE.

ALL RIGHT. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM E. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM E? IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND E AND F ARE BOTH ROLL CALL OR JUST. BOTH? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IF YOU'LL PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND IN. DO WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE A MOTION AND ROLL CALL VOTE? ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY ANDY. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. HAVE A SECOND FROM BRANDON. SO EDDIE, I'M A YES. ANDY J. YES. BRANDON. YES. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES 6 TO 0. MOVE TO ITEM F, CONDUCT

[VIII.F. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider testimony regarding the proposed 2026 Ad Valorem Tax Rate and act upon an Ordinance of the City of Celina, Texas, establishing and levying municipal Ad Valorem Taxes for the tax year 2026, at a rate of $0.571677 per one hundred dollars ($100.00) assessed valuation, which includes a maintenance and operations component and a debt service component, on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City; and providing for collection of the municipal Ad Valorem Taxes, including interest and penalties on delinquent payments. (Bromiley)]

MOTION TO APPROVE THE MOTION TO APPROVE. DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND FROM ANDY? SO EDDIE, I'M A YES. ANDY. SHEA. YES. SHANE. BRANDON. YES. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES 6 TO 0. WE WILL

[IX.A. Consider and act upon an Ordinance of the City of Celina, Texas, ratifying the property tax increase reflected in the annual budget for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027, beginning October 1, 2026, and ending September 30, 2027. (Bromiley) ]

[01:45:09]

[IX.B. Consider and act upon an Ordinance approving and authorizing the issuance and sale of the City of Celina, Texas, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (Ariana Public Improvement District Improvement Areas #1-3 Project); and approving and authorizing related agreements. (Bromiley) ]

ROBIN GAVE A GREAT OVERVIEW DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER EIGHT D. SO I'LL GO THROUGH THE ACTUAL BOND PORTION. AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LOTS THAT ARE BENEFITED BY THIS 370 DIVIDED INTO THE THREE IMPROVEMENT AREAS THAT ROBIN TALKED ABOUT UPON FINAL BUILD OUT, WE'RE LOOKING FOR A VALUE OF APPROXIMATELY 225.6 MILLION.

AND WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT IS 19,049,000. SO THAT DID COME DOWN SLIGHTLY FROM THE ESTIMATE THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PROVIDED THAT ROBIN WENT THROUGH. THE VALUE OF THE LIEN IS 2.41 TO 1. YOU TYPICALLY TARGET AROUND THREE, BUT YOU ALLOW WITHIN YOUR PIT POLICY TO HAVE A LOWER THAN THAT, WHICH WAS ALSO CONTEMPLATED WITHIN THE ARIANA PIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. HOWEVER, THERE IS A HOLD BACK AND ALL THAT SIMPLY MEANS IS DEVELOPER HAS TO PUT VALUE ON THE GROUND COMMENSURATE WITH REACHING THE 3 TO 1 BEFORE THEY CAN ACCESS ALL OF THE FUNDS THAT THEY ARE OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO FROM THIS BOND ISSUE. SO THE BOND TERM, AS ARE MOST OF YOUR PITS, 30 YEARS AT A FINAL TRUE INTEREST COST OR A TIC AVERAGE RATE, IF YOU WILL, OF 6.30%. AND THEN THE NET BOND PROCEEDS, WHICH, AS YOU PROBABLY RECALL, CAN ONLY BE USED FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ITEMS. THAT'S WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE AND STREETS FOR THE ARIANA PIT IS JUST UNDER $16 MILLION. AND THEN THE ESTIMATED MAXIMUM OVERLAPPING TAX STACK, BECAUSE THE TAX STACKS ARE A LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM ONE IMPROVEMENT AREA TO THE NEXT, THE MAX IS $2.81. AND THAT DOES TAKE INTO ACCOUNT CITY TAX RATE. COUNTY, COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT AS WELL AS SALINA. I'D.

SO WITH THAT, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE ON THE BOND ISSUANCE.

QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. FOR ITEM B. I WILL LOOK FOR A MOTION MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM B HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. DO I HAVE A SECOND. SECOND. OKAY I HAVE A SECOND. EVERYBODY PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES FOR ITEM B. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES 6 TO

[IX.C. Consider and act to authorize the FY2027 purchase of Sensus water meters, accessories, and associated fees from Aqua-Metric Sales, as the sole-source provider, in an amount not to exceed $2,153,104.00, and to amend the previously approved FY2026 meter purchase authorization of $1,652,983.65 by an additional $173,955.82, for a total amended FY2026 amount of $1,826,939.47. (Figueroa) ]

[01:50:12]

WE ALSO HAVE ANNUAL SUPPORT AND SUBSCRIPTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS. THIS GIVES US A CUSTOMER SERVICE AS WELL, AS WELL AS REAL TIME TROUBLESHOOTING, ALONG WITH THE ABILITY TO NOTIFY CUSTOMERS AND OUR PORTAL FOR OUR CUSTOMERS CAN REACH OUT AND SEE THEIR ACTUAL DATA AND THEIR USAGE THROUGHOUT THEIR WATER BILLING SYSTEM. SO WITH THAT, PRETTY QUICK AND SIMPLE, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS? NOPE. THERE'S NO QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM C. MOTION TO APPROVE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

AND I HAVE A SECOND. EVERYBODY WILL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES 6 TO

[IX.D. Consider and act to approve an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Celina and the Celina Economic Development Corporation. (Satarino) ]

AND THIS DOES REPLACE THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE AND OFFICE SPACE AGREEMENT. SO ON THE GOVERNANCE AND REPORTING STRUCTURE, THE CDC BOARD RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRATEGIC PRIORITIES, CORPORATE ACTIONS AND CORPORATE ACTIONS. THE BOARD MAINTAINS AUTHORITY OVER PROJECTS, PROGRAMS, BUDGETS, CONTRACTS AND FINANCIAL POLICIES. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REMAINS REQUIRED WHEN APPLICABLE THROUGH OUR BYLAWS AND CHARTER.

THE CITY MANAGER SUPERVISES CITY EMPLOYEES ASSIGNED TO SUPPORT THE CDC. THIS WAS THE BYLAW CHANGE THAT WAS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL AT THE LAST MEETING. THE PRESIDENT MANAGES DAILY CDC OPERATIONS OPERATIONS AND IMPLEMENTS BOARD APPROVED ACTIONS. THE PRESIDENT IS ADMINISTRATIVELY ACCOUNTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. SO FOR PERSONNEL AND PAYROLL, THE CITY WILL NOW ADMINISTER PAYROLL TAXES, RETIREMENT INSURANCE, LEAVE AND PERSONNEL RECORDS.

THE CDC WILL FUND THOSE PERSONNEL COSTS ASSIGNED TO THE CORPORATION. FUNDING ASSIGNMENTS AND PERCENTAGES WILL BE IDENTIFIED ANNUALLY IN EXHIBIT A. POSITIONS MAY BE FUNDED THROUGH DIRECT CDC ACCOUNTS OR MONTHLY REIMBURSEMENT. BOARD APPROVED PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES WILL BE ADMINISTERED THROUGH CITY PAYROLL. THE CDC BOARD AT THEIR LAST MEETING LAST WEEK, DID APPROVE AN UPDATED FISCAL POLICY. CDC EXPENDITURES REMAIN

[01:55:05]

INVOICING, RECEIPTS AND DEPOSITS. RESTRICTED FUND TRACKING AND PAYMENT PROCESSING.

OF COURSE, AS WE MENTIONED, PAYROLL, ADMINISTRATION, ACCOUNT RECONCILIATION, FINANCIAL REPORTING AND AUDIT SUPPORT, CDC FUNDS AND FUND BALANCE WILL REMAIN SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED AS REQUIRED TO BE, AND THE CITY MAY NOT COMMIT CDC FUNDS WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION. SO AS PART OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT, THERE'S A AGREEMENT FOR OFFICE SPACE. AND SO OUR CURRENT OFFICE SPACE AT 32 WEST WALNUT STREET AT $60,000 ANNUALLY, THOSE OFFICE SPACE PAYMENTS ARE MADE QUARTERLY FACILITY CHARGE INCLUDES MAINTENANCE, UTILITIES, SECURITY AND CUSTODIAL SERVICES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES AND PAYROLL SERVICES, $15,000 ANNUALLY AND FINANCIAL SERVICES $15,000 ANNUALLY. THE AGREEMENT DOES HAVE AN INITIAL TERM OF FIVE YEARS. THIS DOES RENEW AUTOMATICALLY FOR SUCCESSIVE ONE YEAR TERMS. EITHER PARTY MAY TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 90 DAYS OF WRITTEN NOTICE. INDIVIDUAL SERVICES MAY ALSO BE TERMINATED WITH 90 DAYS OF NOTICE. THOSE ANNUAL EXHIBITS THAT I REFERENCED, THOSE MAY BE UPDATED FOLLOWING APPROVAL OF THE CITY AND CDC BUDGETS, AND DO NOT REQUIRE TO HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE BORDER. CITY COUNCIL MATERIAL CHANGES, HOWEVER, DO REQUIRE APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL AND THE CDC BOARD. AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. AND I WILL LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM D. MOTION TO APPROVE A MOTION TO APPROVE D. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND A SECOND.

EVERYBODY PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE FOR ITEM D. THAT MOTION CARRIES 6 TO 0. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO

[IX.E. Consider and act to authorize Change Order No. 3 for Glendenning Parkway Improvements, Bid 2026-005, in the amount of $72,825.00 with GRod Construction, for the addition of a temporary connection from Old Log Trail to CR 53. (Janney)]

THIS CHANGE ORDER IS LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF GLENDENING PARKWAY. THIS OLD LOG TRAIL JUST SOUTH OF GLEN CROSSING DOWN TO COUNTY ROAD 53. SO THERE'S TWO OPTIONS HERE TONIGHT. ONE IS TO APPROVE THE CHANGE ORDER. THE SECOND OPTION IS TO DENY THE CHANGE ORDER AND TO DIRECT STAFF TO CHANGE SCOPE. SO OPTION ONE IS ON THE LEFT HERE. THE CHANGE ORDER IN PARTICULAR IS SHOWN IN RED WHICH WOULD BE A TEMPORARY FLEX BASE CONNECTION THAT WOULD BE DONE BEFORE THE ASPHALT REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT SHOWN IN GREEN ABOVE. OPTION TWO DENYING THE CHANGE ORDER AND CHANGING THE SCOPE, WE WOULD COMPLETE OLD LOG TRAIL AS WELL AS COUNTY ROAD 53 AND CONCRETE, FOLLOWED BY THE ASPHALT REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF GLENDENNING. SO THIS PRESENTATION IS GOING TO RUN THROUGH OPTION ONE FIRST, AND THEN OPTION TWO AFTER THAT AND LAND ON A COMPARISON SLIDE. SO FIRST STEP IS A LITTLE CLOSER. ZOOM IN ON THE SECTION OF FLEX BASE ABOUT 20FT WIDE. THAT WOULD TEMPORARILY CONNECT THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO CR 53.

THAT'S OPTION ONE. A LITTLE HISTORY ON GLENDENNING. THE BID WAS AWARDED BY COUNCIL IN MARCH OF 25. THEY'RE. THE REPAIR CONSISTS OF FULL DEPTH SPOT REPAIRS, AS WELL AS AN OVERALL SURFACE TREATMENT TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE ROAD. SO IN THE TOP RIGHT YOU CAN SEE KIND OF A STREET VIEW SHOWING SOME ALLIGATOR CRACKING WITHIN THE PAVEMENT THAT'S OUT THERE TODAY.

AND THE BOTTOM IMAGE, YOU CAN SEE ALL THE AREAS WHERE SPOT REPAIRS NEED TO BE COMPLETED TO REPAIR THE ASPHALT ROAD. THEY'RE SIMILAR TO THAT. NOT ALL OF THEM ARE ALLIGATOR CRACKS, BUT SIMILAR SHAPE. A PUBLIC MEETING WAS HELD FOR THE PROJECT IN AUGUST OF THIS YEAR.

DURING THE MEETING, WE GOT SOME CONCERNS AND FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS AS WELL AS STAKEHOLDERS. WE EVALUATED THE OPTION OF CONNECTING OLD LOG TRAIL VIA FLEX BASE AND THEN ALSO CHANGE THE PHASING PLAN TO ALLOW FOR ONE WAY TRAFFIC WESTBOUND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF THAT PROJECT. WE'RE STILL WORKING ON THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NOW FOR THAT, BUT IF

[02:00:02]

PROJECT WOULD LAST ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS, COMPLETING IN ABOUT Q2 OF 27. SO THE PRICE FOR OPTION ONE, WHICH IS JUST THE CHANGE ORDER, IS 72,825, WHICH REVISES THE TOTAL CONTRACT TO ONE POINT, ABOUT 1.3 MILLION. SO THAT'S IT FOR OPTION ONE, WHICH IS THE OLD LOG TRAIL FLEX BASE. NO CHANGES TO THE CR 53. AND THE ASPHALT. NEXT STEP IS OPTION TWO, WHICH IS TO DENY THE CHANGE ORDER AND DIRECT STAFF TO CHANGE THE PROJECT SCOPE. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, BLUE IS THE CONCRETE OLD LOG TRAIL AND CR 53 AND ALSO INCLUDES THE ASPHALT REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT.

THIS IS A PICTURE OF WHAT CR 53 LOOKS LIKE. TODAY. WE DID COMPLETE DESIGN OF THE CONCRETE OF OLD LOG TRAIL AND CR 53 THAT'S BEEN COMPLETED AND THE. THE PROJECT WAS REMOVED FROM CONSTRUCTION IN THE FIVE YEAR. THIS YEAR THERE ARE SOME SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS FOR DOING CR 53 AND OLD LOG TRAIL AND CONCRETE. OBVIOUSLY IMPROVING THE RAILROAD CROSSING, IMPROVING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, ALLOWING FOR ADDITIONAL CONNECTIONS TO THE SUBDIVISION AND PROMOTING ADDITIONAL OPTIONS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND UNDEVELOPED TRACTS IN THE AREA. IT'S ALSO NICE THAT THERE'S NO BRANCH CREEK FLOODS WHEN IT RAINS, AND THERE'LL BE A TURNAROUND PLACE THERE WITHIN THAT DESIGN. SO THESE ARE ALL BENEFITS OF THAT TIMELINE FOR OPTION TWO. SO THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF DRAINAGE THAT'S CHANGED IN THE AREA. SO WE NEED TO GO BACK OUT AND DO SOME SURVEYING AND TWEAK THE DESIGN FOR THE PLANS AND THEN REBID. THAT TAKES ABOUT SIX MONTHS. AND THEN WE HAD TO ACTUALLY DO THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION, WHICH WAS ABOUT 12 MONTHS. AND THEN SUBSEQUENTLY, ONCE THAT'S COMPLETED, WE WOULD GO BACK AND DO THE GLENDENNING ASPHALT REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT, WHICH IS ABOUT THE SAME TIMELINE ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS. SO IN TOTAL, YOU'RE LOOKING AT 26 MONTHS FOR OPTION TWO OVERALL COST. WE DID HAVE AN OPC C DONE IN 2025 WHICH IS ABOUT 2.5 MILLION. WE ADDED A 15% CONTINGENCY TO THIS TO ACCOUNT FOR INFLATION AND THE NORMAL CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY, WHICH GETS YOU TO ABOUT 3 MILLION. THEN YOU ADD IN THE COST OF DOING THE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT FOR GLENDENNING, WHICH IS 1.3, GETTING YOU TO A TOTAL OF 4.3 MILLION. SO AND THEN THIS THIS IS A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIONS HERE. SO OPTION ONE APPROVED THE CHANGE ORDER COST ABOUT 1.3 MILLION. YOU ONLY GET THE TEMPORARY FLEX BASE CONNECTION. THE TIME IS ONLY EIGHT MONTHS. OPTION TWO DENY THE CHANGE ORDER DIRECT STAFF TO CHANGE THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT. IT'S COST A BIT MORE 4.3 MILLION, BUT YOU GET THE OVERALL IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY FOR GLEN CROSSING THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS AND A PERMANENT ROADWAY. TIMELINES. 26 MONTHS. HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE PICTURE? THE MAP SLIDE? I'LL TRY AND YEAH, THE THE OTHER ONE MAYBE. THAT'S THAT'S WAS THERE. WHAT WAS THE OTHER ONES? THAT PROBLEM. THAT PROBABLY THIS, THIS IS FINE. I JUST WANTED TO EXPLAIN IT TO EVERYONE. SO COUNCILMAN FERGUSON AND MYSELF ATTENDED THE PUBLIC MEETING.

THE REASON WE HAD TAKEN ORIGINALLY, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WERE ON AND REVIEWED THE CIP, WE HAD TAKEN COUNTY ROAD 53 OFF. THIS IS THE ROAD WHERE COUNTY ROAD 51 FROM THE OUTER LOOP CONNECTS TO 53. IT CREATES A LOT OF DUST FOR THE SECOND PHASE OF THE SWEETWATER NEIGHBORHOOD AND LIGHT FARMS. THE INTENT OF THAT WAS THE LARGE, HEAVY TRUCKS GO THROUGH AND DESTROY THAT ROAD. IT'S NOT ASPHALT TODAY. THEY CREATE A LOT OF DUST. BUT WE WERE WORRIED ABOUT INCENTIVIZING RESIDENTS AND SPENDING TAX DOLLARS FOR A BURDEN THAT WAS OUTSIDE OF OUR CITY LIMITS. AFTER SITTING THROUGH THE THE PUBLIC MEETING, BOTH CODY HUNTER WITH METHODIST HOSPITAL WAS THERE, AS WELL AS DAVID FINK REPRESENTING CELINA ISD.

THEY HAVE A VERY LARGE WORRY ABOUT HOW BUSSES GET IN AND OUT OF. WHEN YOU GO TO A MONITORED SIGNAL BECAUSE IT DELAYS THEM AND IT'S UNPREDICTABLE. CODY WAS VERY WORRIED ABOUT THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TAKING PLACE. WHILE THE INTERSECTION OF 428 AND DALLAS PARKWAY IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION. IF IN TURN THE CONNECTION TO OLD LOG A TRAIL WAS MADE TO COUNTY ROAD 53 THAT WOULD ALLOW NT TO. TO FINISH THEIR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS BECAUSE AS OF AS

[02:05:02]

SINCE IT'S GOING TO BE DIFFICULT ONCE GLENDINNING IS CLOSED. SO WHERE DOES THAT DIFFERENCE? CAN YOU GO BACK TO THAT LAST SLIDE WHERE IT SHOWED THE TWO OPTIONS? WHERE DOES THAT DIFFERENCE COME FROM? WHERE DOES THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE 1.3 TO THE 4.3 COME FROM THE COST. SO THE NO NO. WHERE DOES IT COME FROM? HOW DO WE PAY FOR IT IS WHAT I WANT TO KNOW. CARLA JUST SHAKES SOME COUCH CUSHIONS AND MAKES MAGIC HAPPEN. OTHER. OTHER THAN THAT, WE'LL LOOK AT OUR AVAILABLE FUNDS, BUT WE. WE'LL PROBABLY HAVE TO GO BACK AND ADJUST THE CIP AND REARRANGE SOME PROJECTS. I MEAN, WE THE DOWNTOWN ROADS, NOT NECESSARILY. OKAY. IT CAN BE, IT CAN BE. HOWEVER, THE COUNCIL WANTS TO TO REARRANGE THAT. BUT ONCE WE HAVE DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL, WE CAN BRING BACK AS PART OF OUR CIP FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR, WHICH IS COMING UP HERE IN THE FALL. MOVING THIS BACK UP AND AND LOOKING AT THE IMPACT ON, ON PROJECTS, WHICH DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN DOWNTOWN ROADS. IT'S IT'S WHICHEVER DIRECTION COUNCIL WOULD WANT TO GO. DO WE HAVE A TIMELINE ON WHEN THAT INTERSECTION OVER THERE ON FOR 28 IN THE TOLLWAY IS GOING TO BE JUST FINE. I MEAN, IT'S JUST BEEN SITTING THERE FOR MONTHS, I FEEL LIKE WITH NO WORK ON IT AND IT'S JUST GOT A BIG, BIG HOLE, 90 DEGREE HOLE IN THE ROAD. MY UNDERSTANDING, IT'S THE LAST PART OF WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE THE D.A.

EXTENSION. SO FALL OF 2027. YEAH, A YEAR SUMMER, SUMMER OF 2027, WHICH IF WE DO THIS, THEN THE CONSTRUCTION OF 51 AND 53 TO OLD LOG TRAIL WILL TAKE A YEAR, ALLOWING THAT TO FINISH, WHICH THEN IN TURN, YOU WOULD THEN START THE. WE WOULD JUST HAVE TO PATCH GLENDENNING IN THE MEANTIME. SO I GUESS MY CONCERN IS, THOUGH, YOU'RE GOING TO YOU'RE GOING TO ROUTE THAT TRAFFIC ONE WAY ON SUNSET. THAT'S GOING TO CREATE TOTAL NIGHTMARE CLUSTER OVER ON FOR 28 AND THE TOLLWAY, WHICH IS ALREADY BAD NOW BECAUSE YOU COME TO A FOUR WAY STOP, THERE'S SUCH A WIDE INTERSECTION THAT NOBODY KNOWS WHEN IT'S THEIR TURN TO GO, WHEN IT'S NOT THEIR TURN TO GO, IT JUST CAUSES A LOT OF ISSUES OVER THERE. SO WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THIS A ONE WAY ROAD FOR 26 MORE MONTHS. THAT'S PRETTY MUCH NO. IT WOULD BE TWO TWO SEPARATE PHASES. SO THE GLENDENNING PROJECT IS AN 8 TO 9 MONTH CONSTRUCTION TIME FRAME.

IT WOULD BE ABOUT A YEAR FOR THE 51 TO 53. AND THEN YOU HAVE ABOUT SIX MONTHS OF DESIGN.

THEY WOULDN'T BE HAPPENING SIMULTANEOUSLY. WE WOULD DO 51 TO 53 TO OLD LOG TRAIL FIRST, AND THEN COME BACK AND DO THE FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION AFTER WHEN THE TOLLWAY WILL BE DONE.

SO THIS PROJECT, IF YOU GO WITH OPTION TWO, ALLOWS THE TOLLWAY TO FINISH BEFORE GLENDENNING GOES UNDER CONSTRUCTION. IF WE DO THE OLD LOG TRAIL WHERE THEY PUT IT IN, IS IT CONCRETE YOU WANT TO DO? DOES THAT DOES THAT GIVE PEOPLE THE OPTION TO GET OVER ON TO THE LOOP OVER THERE? YES. THAT'S WHAT THEY'VE BEEN ASKING FOR SINCE THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE'S AN OLD DIRT. THERE'S AN OLD DIRT ROAD THERE NOW. AND I THINK WE STILL HAVE AN EASEMENT ON IT. RIGHT? IT'S JUST YEAH, WE HAVE RIGHT OF WAY FOR IT. SO I GUESS THEN MY NEXT QUESTION WOULD BE IF WE DO CONCRETE THIS IN AND THEY HAVE ALL THESE SEMI TRUCKS OVER THERE DRIVING ON IT, HOW LONG IS THIS CONCRETE GOING TO LAST OVER THERE WITH THESE TRUCKS JUST DRIVING ON IT NONSTOP? YEAH, THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. WE'LL DESIGN THE SECTION, THE SUBGRADE AND THE SECTION OF THE STREET TO ACCOMMODATE THAT. AND THEN WE WOULD CREATE A NEW TRUCK ROUTE TO GO OUT, OLD LOG

[02:10:05]

[IX.F. Consider and act upon a Resolution appointing members to fill terms on the City's boards, commissions, committees, and corporations. (Owens) ]

[IX.G. Consider and act upon a Resolution appointing members to fill terms on the Keep Celina Beautiful Board. (Owens)]

[02:15:03]

THE MOTION CARRIES 6 TO 0. AND WITH THAT, THE MEE

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.